首页> 外文OA文献 >Do position and species identity of neighbours matter in 8–15-year-old post harvest mesic stands in the boreal mixedwood?
【2h】

Do position and species identity of neighbours matter in 8–15-year-old post harvest mesic stands in the boreal mixedwood?

机译:在收获后的混交林中,混交林中的8-15岁邻居的位置和物种身份是否重要?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Neighbourhood competition indices (NCI), where position and species identity of neighbours are known, have been used to investigate growth and competitive interactions among adult trees. In this study, we used NCI in 8–15-year-old stands following clear-cutting in a boreal mixedwood forest of eastern Canada to improve our understanding of early successional forest dynamics. Trees of increasing diameter from the center (≥1 cm) to the edge (≥5 cm) were mapped in twenty-five circular 450m2 plots. Target trees (DBH≥1 cm) were sampled in plot center to determine their annual radial stem growth. For each species, we compared a set of growth models using either a spatially explicit NCI or a non-spatial competition index. Both types of indices estimated a species-specific competition coefficient for each pair of competitor–target species. NCI were selected as the best competition model for all target species although differences in variance explained relative to the non-spatial index were small. This likely indicates that competition occurs at the local level but that the high density and the relative uniformity of these young stands creates similar neighbourhoods for most trees in a given stand. The effective neighbourhood radius for competitors varied among species and was smaller for shade tolerant species. Intraspecific neighbours were the strongest competitors for most species. Aspen (Populus tremuloides) was a weak competitor for all species as opposed to balsam fir (Abies balsamea) which was a strong competitor in all cases. These results are in contradiction with some widely used forest policies in North America (e.g. free-to-grow standards) that consider broadleaf species, such as aspen, as the strongest competitors. For these early successional forests, the decision regarding the use of spatial or non-spatial competition indices should rest on the intended use. For even-age management, spatial indices might not justify their use in highdensity stands but they are needed for the simulation of novel harvest techniques creating complex stand structure.
机译:已知邻居的位置和物种身份的邻里竞争指数(NCI)已用于调查成年树的生长和竞争相互作用。在这项研究中,我们在加拿大东部的北方混交林中进行了清晰的砍伐后,在8-15岁的林分中使用了NCI,以增进我们对早期演替森林动态的了解。从中心(≥1cm)到边缘(≥5cm)直径不断增大的树木被绘制成25个450m2的圆形图。在样地中心对目标树木(DBH≥1cm)进行采样,以确定其年生径向茎生长。对于每个物种,我们使用空间明确的NCI或非空间竞争指数比较了一组生长模型。两种类型的指数都估计了每对竞争者目标物种的特定物种竞争系数。 NCI被选为所有目标物种的最佳竞争模型,尽管相对于非空间指数的方差差异很小。这很可能表明竞争发生在地方一级,但是这些幼林的高密度和相对均匀性为给定林中的大多数树木创建了相似的邻域。竞争者的有效邻域半径因物种而异,对于耐荫物种则较小。种内邻居是大多数物种的最强竞争者。白杨(Populus tremuloides)在所有物种中都是较弱的竞争者,而香脂冷杉(Abies balsamea)在所有情况下均是强竞争者。这些结果与北美一些广泛采用的森林政策(例如自由生长的标准)相矛盾,后者认为阔叶树种(例如白杨)是最强的竞争者。对于这些早期演替森林,有关使用空间或非空间竞争指数的决定应取决于预期用途。对于偶数年龄管理,空间指数可能无法证明其在高密度林分中的合理使用,但对于创建复杂林分结构的新型收获技术的仿真而言,它们是必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号