首页> 外文OA文献 >A COMPARISON OF VARIOUS NODAL DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR THE 3D EULER EQUATIONS
【2h】

A COMPARISON OF VARIOUS NODAL DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHODS FOR THE 3D EULER EQUATIONS

机译:三维欧拉方程的各种节点间断Galerkin方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent research has indicated that collocation-type Discontinuous Galerkin SpectraludElement Methods (DGSEM) represent a more efficient alternative to the standard modal orudnodal DG approaches. In this paper, we compare two collocation-type nodal DGSEM and audstandard nodal DG approach in the context of the three-dimensional Euler equations. The nodaludDG schemes for hexahedral elements are based on the polynomial interpolation of the unknownudsolution using tensor product Lagrange basis functions and the use of Gaussian quadratureudfor integration. In the standard nodal DG approach, we employ uniform interpolation nodesudand Legendre-Gauss (LG) quadrature points. The two collocated DGSEM schemes arise fromudusing either LG or Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto (LGL) points as both interpolation and integrationudnodes. The resulting diagonal mass matrices and the ability to compute the fluxes directly fromudthe solution nodes give rise to highly efficient schemes.udThe results of the numerical convergence studies highlight, especially at high approximationudorders, the performance improvement of the DGSEM schemes compared to the standardudDG scheme. Although having advantages in the evaluation of the boundary values over theudLG-DGSEM, the lower degree of precision of the LGL quadrature negates this benefit. In addition,udwithout the application of filtering techniques or over-integration, the lower integrationudaccuracy of the LGL-DGSEM leads to numerical instabilities at stagnation points. Hence, theudLG-DGSEM is found to be the most efficient scheme as it is more accurate and robust for theudconsidered test cases.
机译:最近的研究表明,搭配型不连续的Galerkin谱 UdElement方法(DGSEM)代表了标准模态或 UdNodal DG方法的更有效的替代方法。在本文中,我们在三维欧拉方程的上下文中比较了两个搭配型节点DGSEM和A UdStandard节点DG方法。 Nodal UDDG用于六面体元素的方案基于Unknown Udsolution的多项式插值使用张量产品拉长基础函数和使用高斯正交 UDFor集成的使用。在标准的节点DG方法中,我们采用统一的插值节点 Udand Legendre-Gauss(LG)正交点。这两个并置的DGSEM方案出现在 Udusing或Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto(LGL)点作为插值和集成 UDnodes。由此产生的对角线质量矩阵和直接计算助焊剂的能力从溶液节点引起高效方案。 Ud的数值趋同研究结果突出显示,特别是在高近似 udorders中,比较了DGSEM方案的性能改进到标准 UDDG方案。虽然在评估 UDLG-DGSEM的边界值方面具有优势,但LGL正交的较低程度的精度否定了这种益处。此外, udwithout应用过滤技术或过度集成,LGL-DGSEM的较低集成 UDCCuracy在停滞点处导致数值不稳定性。因此,发现 udlg-dgsem是最有效的方案,因为它对于 Udconsidered测试用例来说是更准确和鲁棒的方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号