首页> 外文OA文献 >Techno-economic analysis of sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming in a fixed bed reactor network integrated with fuel cell
【2h】

Techno-economic analysis of sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming in a fixed bed reactor network integrated with fuel cell

机译:在与燃料电池集成的固定床反应器网络中吸附增强蒸汽甲烷重整的技术经济分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) is a promising alternative for H2 production with inherent CO2 capture. This study evaluates the techno-economic performance of SE-SMR in a network of fixed beds and its integration with a solid oxide fuel cell (SE-SMR-SOFC) for power generation. The analysis revealed that both proposed systems are characterised by better economic performance than the reference systems. In particular, for SE-SMR the levelised cost of hydrogen is 1.6 €⋅kg−1 and the cost of CO2 avoided is 29.9 €⋅tCO2−1 (2.4 €⋅kg−1 and 50 €⋅tCO2−1, respectively, for SMR with CO2 capture) while for SE-SMR-SOFC the levelised cost of electricity is 0.078 €⋅kWh−1 and the cost of CO2 avoided is 36.9 €⋅tCO2−1 (0.080 €⋅kWh−1 and 80 €⋅tCO2−1, respectively, for natural gas-fired power plant with carbon capture). The sensitivity analysis showed that the specific cost of fuel and the capital cost of fuel cell mainly affect the economic performance of SE-SMR and SE-SMR-SOFC, respectively. The daily revenue of the SE-SMR-SOFC system is higher than that of the natural gas-fired power plant if the difference between the carbon tax and the CO2 transport and storage cost is > 6 €⋅tCO2−1.
机译:吸附增强的蒸汽甲烷重整(SE-SMR)是用于生产H2与固有CO2捕获有前途的替代。本研究评估固定床的网络中SE-SMR的技术经济性能以及它与用于发电的固体氧化物燃料电池(SE-SMR-SOFC)的集成。分析表明,这两个提议的系统是由比参考系统更好的经济性能为特征。特别地,对于SE-SMR氢的平准化成本是1.6€⋅kg-1和CO2避免的成本分别是29.9€⋅tCO2-1(2.4€⋅kg-1和50€⋅tCO2-1,用于SMR具有CO2捕获),而SE-SMR-SOFC电力的平准化成本是0.078€⋅kWh-1和CO2避免的成本是36.9€⋅tCO2-1(0.080€⋅kWh-1和80€⋅tCO2- 1,分别用于燃天然气碳捕获电厂)。敏感性分析表明,燃料的具体费用和燃料电池的资金成本主要影响SE-SMR和SE-SMR-SOFC的经济表现,分别。在SE-SMR-SOFC系统的日常收入比天然气发电厂的更高,如果碳税和二氧化碳的运输和储存成本之间的差异> 6€⋅tCO2-1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号