首页> 外文OA文献 >Very long distance connection of gigawatt‐size offshore wind farms: extra high‐voltage AC versus high‐voltage DC cost comparison
【2h】

Very long distance connection of gigawatt‐size offshore wind farms: extra high‐voltage AC versus high‐voltage DC cost comparison

机译:千兆瓦大小的海上风电场的长距离连接:额外的高压交流与高压直流成本比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study presents a cost comparison between commercially available high-voltage DC (HVDC) and extra high-voltage AC shore connection (±320 kV voltage source converter and 420 kV-50 Hz single-core and three-core cables), for a 1 GW offshore wind farm cluster, considering transmission distances up to 400 km. The HVDC system is a point-to-point connection whereas multiple AC intermediate compensating stations are envisaged for AC when needed. Capital costs are evaluated from recently awarded contracts, operating costs include energy losses and missed revenues due to transmission system unavailability, both estimated using North Sea wind production curves. Optimal AC intermediate compensation, if any, and reactive profiles are also taken into account. Resultsshow that HVDC has lower transmission losses at distances in excess of 130 km; however, due to the combined effect of lower AC capital cost and unavailability, using three-core aluminium cables can be more convenient up to 360 km distance.
机译:本研究提出了商业上可获得的高压DC(HVDC)和超高压交流界连接(±320 kV电压源转换器和420 kV-50 Hz单核和三芯电缆)之间的成本比较GW海上风电场群,考虑到400公里的传输距离。 HVDC系统是点对点连接,而在需要时设想多个AC中间补偿站。资本成本从最近授予的合同评估,运营成本包括使用北海风力生产曲线估计的传输系统不可用的能源损失和未列的收入。还考虑最佳AC中间补偿,如果有的话和无功谱。结果表明,HVDC在超过130公里的距离处具有较低的传输损耗;但是,由于较低的AC资本成本和不可用的效果,使用三芯铝电缆可以更方便地长达360公里。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号