首页> 外文OA文献 >Two Green Poets: A Comparative Ecocritical Study of Sepehri and Emerson
【2h】

Two Green Poets: A Comparative Ecocritical Study of Sepehri and Emerson

机译:两位绿色诗人:塞佩里与爱默生的比较生态批评研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many similar subjects can be traced in world literature; among them is nature since it belongs to man/nature binary opposition. The American poet and philosopher, Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) employs nature in his works. Throughout his works, the American writer discusses the affinity between man and nature, emphasizing how man takes advantage of it. The contemporary Iranian poet, Sohrab Sepehri (1928-1980), also makes intensive use of nature in his poems; his interest in the subject increases along with his tendency to Buddhism. Sepehri is proficient in using nature either in philosophical or emotional issues. Due to the significance of nature in the works or the two figures, an ecocritical reading of them is not only applicable but unavoidable. This comparative study aims at investigating different approaches towards nature employed by the two poets, emphasizing their points of difference. Although both poets employ nature in their works with romantic tendencies, the postmodern environmental ethics of Sepehri is in direct contrast to the instrumental value viewpoint held by his American counterpart.
机译:许多类似的科目可以在世界文学中追踪;其中是自然,因为它属于人/自然二元反对派。美国诗人和哲学家,拉尔夫沃尔多·艾默生(1803-1882)在他的作品中雇用了本质。在他的作品中,美国作家讨论了人与自然之间的亲和力,强调人们如何利用它。当代伊朗诗人,Sohrab Sepehri(1928-1980),也在他的诗中进行了密集地利用自然;他对这个主题的兴趣随着他对佛教的倾向而增加。 Sepehri在哲学或情绪问题中熟练地使用性质。由于作品中的自然或两个数字的意义,他们的生态阅读不仅适用而不是不可避免的。该比较研究旨在调查两位诗人采用的自然的不同方法,强调他们的差异。虽然两个诗人都与浪漫倾向的作品中的自然,但苏州的后现代环境伦理与他的美国同行持有的乐器价值观点相比直接对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号