首页> 外文OA文献 >Reliability and validity of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International after hip fracture in patients aged ≥65 years
【2h】

Reliability and validity of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International after hip fracture in patients aged ≥65 years

机译:年龄> 65岁患者髋部骨折后跌倒功效量表的可靠性和有效性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: To assess the measurement properties of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in patients after a hip fracture aged ≥ 65 years. Methods: In a sample of 100 patients, we examined the structural validity, internal consistency and construct validity. For the structural validity a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out. For construct validity predetermined hypotheses were tested. In a second sample of 21 older patients the inter-rater reliability was evaluated. Results: The factor analysis yielded strong evidence that the FES-I is uni-dimensional in patients with a hip fracture; the Cronbachs alpha was 0.94. When testing the reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.72, while the Standard Error of Measurement was 6.4 and the Smallest Detectable Change was 17.7 (on a scale from 16 to 64). The Spearman correlation of the FES-I with the one-item fear of falling instrument was high (r = 0.68). The correlation was moderate with instruments measuring functional performance constructs and low with instruments measuring psychological constructs. Conclusions: Reliability and structural validity of the FES-I in patients after a hip fracture are good. The construct validity appears more closely related to functional performance constructs than to psychological constructs, suggesting that the concept measured by the FES-I may not capture all aspects of fear of falling.Implications for RehabilitationThe Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), which is commonly used to measure fear of falling in community-dwelling older persons, can also be used to assess fear of falling in patients after a hip fracture.The reliability and the structural validity of the FES-I for these hip patients are good, whereas the construct validity of the FES-I is not optimal.The FES-I may not capture all aspects of fear of falling and may be more closely related to functional performance than to psychological concepts such as anxiety.
机译:目的:在≥65岁的髋部骨折后评估患者患者患者疗效量表(FES-I)的测量特性。方法:在100名患者的样本中,我们检查了结构有效性,内部一致性和构建有效性。对于结构有效性,进行了确认因子分析。对于构造有效性,测试了预定假设。在21名年龄较大的患者的第二个样本中,评估了帧间性计的可靠性。结果:因子分析产生了强有力的证据表明FES-I在髋部骨折患者中是单一的; Cronbachs alpha为0.94。在测试可靠性时,类中的相关系数为0.72,而测量标准误差为6.4,最小的可检测变化为17.7(从16到64的等级)。 FES-I与下降仪器恐惧的FES-I的Spearman相关性很高(r = 0.68)。相关性仪器的相关性测量功能性能构造和测量心理结构的仪器。结论:髋部骨折后,患者FES-I的可靠性和结构有效性良好。构建有效性似乎与功能性能构建更密切相关,而不是对心理构建,这表明由FES衡量的概念 - 我可能不会捕获恐惧堕落的所有方面。用于康复的恢复效果规模 - 国际(FES-I),这通常用于衡量害怕落入社区住宅的老年人,也可以用于评估臀部骨折后担心患者跌落的恐惧。对于这些髋关节患者的FES-I的可靠性和结构有效性是好的,而FES-I的构建有效性不是最佳的。FES-I可能不会捕捉到恐惧的所有方面,而不是功能性能比焦虑等心理概念更密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号