首页> 外文OA文献 >Clostridium difficile Testing Algorithm: Is There a Difference in Patients Who Test Positive by Enzyme Immunoassay vs. Those Who Only Test Positive by Nucleic Acid Amplification Methodology?

【2h】

Clostridium difficile Testing Algorithm: Is There a Difference in Patients Who Test Positive by Enzyme Immunoassay vs. Those Who Only Test Positive by Nucleic Acid Amplification Methodology?

机译：Clostridium Termicile测试算法：通过酶免疫测定与核酸扩增方法仅测试阳性的那些患者测试阳性的患者有差异吗？

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Jonathan Polak; Ogheneruona Odili; Mary Ashleigh Craver; Anthony Mayen; Kyle Purrman; Asem Rahman; Charlie Joseph Sang; Paul P Cook;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2017
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Clostridium difficile Testing Algorithms Using Glutamate Dehydrogenase Antigen and C. difficile Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays with C. difficile Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing Increase Diagnostic Yield in a Tertiary Pediatric Population [J] . Kaede V. Ota, Karin L. McGowan Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2012,第4期

机译：使用谷氨酸脱氢酶抗原和艰难梭菌毒素酶免疫分析和艰难梭菌核酸扩增测试的艰难梭菌检测算法可提高三级儿科人群的诊断产量
2. Performance of Clostridium difficile Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay and Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Stratified by Patient Disease Severity [J] . Romney M. Humphries, Daniel Z. Uslan, Zachary Rubin Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2013,第3期

机译：患者病情严重程度对艰难梭菌毒素酶免疫测定和核酸扩增试验的性能影响
3. Performance of Clostridium difficile Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay and Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Stratified by Patient Disease Severity [J] . Romney M. Humphries, Daniel Z. Uslan, Zachary Rubin Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2013,第3期

机译：患者病情严重程度对艰难梭菌毒素酶免疫测定和核酸扩增试验的性能影响
4. Portable Instrument for Paper-Based Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests [C] . Mingdian Liu, Zheyan Tang, Hosein Monshat, Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics . 2020

机译：便携式纸基等温核酸扩增试验仪
5. Do the demographic and behavioral characteristics differ between MSM who self-select repeated vs. one time HIV testing within a 12-month period using a nucleic acid testing (NAT) screening algorithm? [D] . Hansen, Zachary J. 2014

机译：使用核酸测试（NAT）筛选算法在12个月内自我选择重复进行HIV检测或一次HIV检测的MSM之间，人口统计学和行为特征是否有所不同？
6. Clostridium difficile Testing Algorithm: Is There a Difference in Patients Who Test Positive by Enzyme Immunoassay vs. Those Who Only Test Positive by Nucleic Acid Amplification Methodology? [O] . Jonathan Polak, Ogheneruona Odili, Mary Ashleigh Craver, 2017

机译：艰难梭菌检测算法：通过酶免疫测定呈阳性的患者与仅通过核酸扩增方法呈阳性的患者有区别吗？
7. 238 – Nucleic Acid Amplification Followed by Enzyme Immunoassay Testing for Clostridium Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection Versus Colonization in Pediatric Patients [O] . Maribeth R. Nicholson, Jacob M. Parnell, Irtiqa Fazili, 2019

机译：238 - 核酸扩增随后对梭菌性腹菌性的酶免疫测定试验在分化儿科患者中的感染与殖民化方面是不充分的

Clostridium difficile Testing Algorithm: Is There a Difference in Patients Who Test Positive by Enzyme Immunoassay vs. Those Who Only Test Positive by Nucleic Acid Amplification Methodology?

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅