首页> 外文OA文献 >A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil
【2h】

A partisan pandemic: state government public health policies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil

机译:一个党派大流行:国家政府公共卫生政策打击Covid-19在巴西

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction To present an analysis of the Brazilian health system and subnational (state) variation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, based on 10 non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs).Materials and methods We collected daily information on implementation of 10 NPI designed to inform the public of health risks and promote distancing and mask use at the national level for eight countries across the Americas. We then analyse the adoption of the 10 policies across Brazil’s 27 states over time, individually and using a composite index. We draw on this index to assess the timeliness and rigour of NPI implementation across the country, from the date of the first case, 26 February 2020. We also compile Google data on population mobility by state to describe changes in mobility throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.Results Brazil’s national NPI response was the least stringent among countries analysed. In the absence of a unified federal response to the pandemic, Brazilian state policy implementation was neither homogenous nor synchronised. The median NPI was no stay-at-home order, a recommendation to wear masks in public space but not a requirement, a full school closure and partial restrictions on businesses, public transportation, intrastate travel, interstate travel and international travel. These restrictions were implemented 45 days after the first case in each state, on average. Rondônia implemented the earliest and most rigorous policies, with school closures, business closures, information campaigns and restrictions on movement 24 days after the first case; Mato Grosso do Sul had the fewest, least stringent restrictions on movement, business operations and no mask recommendation.Conclusions The study identifies wide variation in national-level NPI responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our focus on Brazil identifies subsequent variability in how and when states implemented NPI to contain COVID-19. States’ NPIs and their scores on the composite policy index both align with the governors’ political affiliations: opposition governors implemented earlier, more stringent sanitary measures than those supporting the Bolsonaro administration. A strong, unified national response to a pandemic is essential for keeping the population safe and disease-free, both at the outset of an outbreak and as communities begin to reopen. This national response should be aligned with state and municipal implementation of NPI, which we show is not the case in Brazil.
机译:介绍巴西卫生系统和水性卫生系统的分析以及响应Covid-19大流行的响应,基于10个非药物干预(NPI)。材料和方法我们收集了关于实施10 NPI的日常信息通知公众健康风险,促进在美洲八个国家的国家一级的疏散和面具使用。然后,我们通过一段时间和使用综合指数分析巴西27个州的10个政策的通过。我们借鉴了这一指标,从2020年2月26日起,评估全国各地NPI实施的时间和严谨性。我们还通过州编制谷歌数据,以描述整个Covid-19的流动性的变化Pandemic.Results巴西的国家NPI反应是分析的国家最不严格的响应。在没有统一联邦对大流行的反应的情况下,巴西国家政策实施既不是同质也没有同步。中位数NPI没有留下留下的订单,建议在公共场所戴上面具,但不是要求,全额学校闭幕和部分限制企业,公共交通,套着旅行,州际旅游和国际旅行。这些限制是在每个州的第一次案件后45天实施。 Rondônia实施了最早,最严格的政策,学校关闭,商业关闭,信息活动和第一次案件后24天的限制; Mato Grosso Do Sul对运动,业务运营和没有掩码建议具有最少的最小严格限制.Conclusions该研究确定了对Covid-19大流行的国家级NPI反应的广泛变化。我们对巴西的关注标识了如何以及当国家实施NPI来包含Covid-19的后续可变性。国家的NPI和他们的分数与综合政策指数都与州长的政治联系方面对齐:反对生州长实施早期,比支持Bolsonaro行政当局的卫生措施更严格。对大流行的强烈,统一的国家反应对于保持人口安全和无疾病,无论是在爆发的一端,而且社区开始重新打开。这种国家反应应与NPI的国家和市政实施一致,我们在巴西的情况下表现出来。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号