首页> 外文OA文献 >Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics
【2h】

Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics

机译:在流利期间的住宅建筑绿色建筑认证系统的准备评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the momentum it has created for global changes affecting various aspects of daily lives. Among these, green building certification systems (GBCSs) should not be left behind as significant potential modifications may be required to ensure their versatility for residential buildings due to the new pandemic reality. The present study aims to evaluate the readiness of chosen GBCSs for a proper assessment of existing residential housing sustainability in a post-pandemic world. Based on a literature review of the state-of-the-art data sources and round table discussions, the present study proposes a particular set of sustainability indicators covering special sustainability requirements under pandemic conditions. Then, those indicators are used to evaluate the readiness of selected GBCSs (BREEAM, LEED, WELL, CASBEE) to meet new pandemic-resilient requirements based on their responses to the indicators. The assessment shows that none of the reviewed GBCSs are fully ready to cover all the proposed indicators. GBCSs have differing focuses on particular sustainability pillars, which also affected their responses to pandemic-resilient categories. For instance, WELL rating system successfully responded to the health and safety category, whereas LEED showed better preparedness in terms of environmental efficiency. BREEAM and CASBEE systems have a more evenly distributed attention to all three pandemic-resilient categories (Health & Safety, Environmental Resources Consumption, and Comfort) with an accent on the Comfort category. On a specific note, all GBCSs are insufficiently prepared for waste and wastewater management. In the future, GBCSs should be modified to better adapt to pandemic conditions, for which the current work may provide a basis. As an alternative, brand new standards can be created to face newly arising and evolving post-pandemic requirements.
机译:Covid-19大流行的后果是它为影响日常生活各个方面的全球变化创造的势头。其中,不应留下绿色建筑认证系统(GBCS),因为可能需要显着的潜在修改,以确保由于新的大流行现实,住宅建筑的多功能性。本研究旨在评估所选择的GBCS的准备,以便在大流行后的世界中对现有的住宅住房可持续性进行适当评估。基于对最先进的数据来源和圆桌讨论的文献综述,本研究提出了一种特定的可持续性指标,涵盖了大流行条件下的特殊可持续性要求。然后,这些指标用于评估选定的GBCS(Breeam,Leed,Well,Casbee)的准备,以满足新的大流行弹性要求,基于它们对指标的响应。评估表明,没有一项审查的GBCS已完全准备好涵盖所有拟议的指标。 GBCS对特定的可持续发展柱具有不同的重点,这也影响了对大流行弹性类别的反应。例如,良好的评级系统成功地响应了健康和安全类别,而LEED在环境效率方面表现出更好的准备。 Bream和Casbee Systems对所有三个大流行弹性类别(健康和安全,环境资源消费和舒适性)有更均匀分布的关注,在舒适类别上具有口音。在特定备注上,所有GBCS都不足够地为废物和废水管理准备。将来,应该修改GBCS以更好地适应流行性条件,目前的工作可以提供基础。作为替代方案,可以创建全新标准以面对新出现并不断发展的大流行后需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号