首页> 外文OA文献 >The addition of very light loads into the routine testing of the bench press increases the reliability of the force–velocity relationship
【2h】

The addition of very light loads into the routine testing of the bench press increases the reliability of the force–velocity relationship

机译:在台式压力机的常规测试中添加非常轻的负载会增加力速度关系的可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The aim of this study was to examine whether the addition of very light loads for modeling the force–velocity (F–V) relationship during the bench press (BP) exercise can confirm its experimental linearity as well as to increase the reliability and concurrent validity of the F–V relationship parameters (maximum force (F0), maximum velocity (V0), F–V slope, and maximum power (Pmax)). Method The F–V relationship of 19 healthy men were determined using three different methods: (I) 6-loads free method: six loads performed during the traditional free-weight BP exercise (≈ 1–8–29–39–49–59 kg), (II) 4-loads free method: four loads performed during the traditional free-weight BP exercise (≈ 29–39–49–59 kg), and (III) 4-loads Smith method: four loads performed during the ballistic bench press throw exercise in a Smith machine (≈ 29–39–49–59 kg). Results The linearity of the F–V relationship was very high and comparable for the three F–V methods (p = 0.204; median Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) = 0.99). The three methods were ranked from the most to the least reliable as follows: 6-loads free (coefficient of variation (CV) range = 3.6–6.7%) > 4-loads Smith (CV range = 4.6–12.4%) > 4-loads free (CV range = 3.8–14.5%). The higher reliability of the 6-loads free method was especially pronounced for F–V slope (CVratio ≥ 1.85) and V0 (CVratio ≥ 1.49) parameters, while the lowest difference in reliability was observed for F0 (CVratio ≤ 1.27). The 6-loads free and 4-loads free methods showed a very high concurrent validity respect to the 4-loads Smith method for F0 and Pmax (r ≥ 0.89), a moderate validity for the F–V slope (r = 0.66–0.82), and a low validity for V0 (r ≤ 0.37). Discussion The routine testing of the F–V relationship of upper-body muscles through the BP exercise should include trials with very light loading conditions to enhance the reliability of the F–V relationship.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是检查在卧式(BP)运动期间的用于建模力 - 速度(F-V)关系的非常轻负载是否可以确认其实验线性,以及增加可靠性和并发F-V关系参数的有效性(最大力(F0),最大速度(V0),F-V斜率和最大功率(PMAX))。方法使用三种不同的方法测定19个健康男性的F-V关系:(i)6-载重方法:在传统的自由重量BP运动期间进行六种载荷(≈1-8-29-39-49-59 kg),(ii)4-载荷自由方法:在传统的自由重量Bp运动期间进行四种载荷(≈29-39-49-59kg),和(iii)4-loads smith方法:在此期间执行四个负载弹道长凳在史密斯机器中投掷锻炼(≈29-39-49-59kg)。结果F-V型关系的线性非常高,三种F-V方法相当(P = 0.204;中值Pearson的相关系数(R)= 0.99)。从最多的三种方法排序,最少可靠,如下:6-载荷(变异系数(CV)范围= 3.6-6.7%)> 4-载荷史密斯(CV范围= 4.6-12.4%)> 4-无负载(CV范围= 3.8-14.5%)。对于F-V坡(CVRATIO≥1.85)和V0(CVRATIO≥1.49)参数特别明显,6负载方法的可靠性特别明显,而F0(CVRATIO≤1.27)观察到可靠性的最低差异(CVRATIO≤1.27)。对于F0和PMAX的4负载史密斯方法(R≥0.89),对4负载史密斯方法的6负载有效的6负载有效,对F-V斜率的适度有效性(r = 0.66-0.82 ),v0的有效性低(r≤0.37)。讨论通过BP锻炼的上身肌肉F-V关系的常规测试应包括具有非常轻的负载条件的试验,以提高F-V关系的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号