首页> 外文OA文献 >Sciatic obturator femoral technique versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. A randomised trial
【2h】

Sciatic obturator femoral technique versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. A randomised trial

机译:坐骨闭合剂股骨技术与患者患者患者患者用Ilizarov外固定器固定突出胫骨骨折的患者。随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Peripheral nerve block is preferable for lower extremity surgery because it sufficiently blocks pain pathways at different levels providing excellent anaesthesia at the site of surgery. We designed this study to compare the efficacy and safety of SOFT block (sciatic-obturator-femoral technique) compared with spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. Methods One hundred and seven patients ASA I, II scheduled for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either spinal anaesthesia or SOFT block. In spinal anaesthesia group, patients received spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7. 5-10mg). In SOFT group, patients received SOFT block with bupivacaine 0.25%. Primary endpoint included the duration of analgesia. The secondary endpoints included patient satisfaction scores, visual analogue scores, incidence of adverse events as vomiting, systemic toxicity from local anaesthetic drug and time to first effect of the techniques. Results The duration of SOFT block and time to first analgesic dose in SOFT group was significantly longer (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding satisfaction scores, the incidence of cardiovascular collapse, seizures and paraesthesia. Pain scores were significantly lower in SOFT group at 3,6,12 h postoperative (p < 0.001). The time to the first effect was significantly longer in SOFT group (p < 0.001). Conclusion SOFT is a feasible technique of local anaesthesia for control of postoperative pain with unremarkable adverse events compared with spinal anaesthesia, in patients undergoing fixation of tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. registry number: NCT03450798 on February 20, 2018.
机译:摘要背景外周神经块对于下肢手术是优选的,因为它足以在不同水平的疼痛途径中堵塞,在手术部位提供优异的麻醉。我们设计了该研究,比较软块(坐骨 - 闭合剂 - 股骨技术)的疗效和安全性与患者进行手术,用于使用Ilizarov外部固定器固定狭窄的胫骨骨折。方法三七名患者ASA I,II计划使用Ilizarov外部固定器固定开放的胫骨骨折。患者随机分配以接受脊髓麻醉或软块。在脊柱麻醉组中,患者接受脊髓麻醉,高压布酸环酸0.5%(7.5-10mg)。在软组织中,患者接受软块,对布比卡因0.25%。主要终点包括镇痛的持续时间。次要终点包括患者满意度评分,视觉模拟分数,不良事件的发生率作为呕吐,从局部麻醉药物的系统性毒性和技术的第一次效果。结果软块软嵌段和时间较小镇痛剂量的持续时间明显更长(P <0.001)。关于满足评分的研究组之间没有显着差异,心血管崩溃,癫痫发作和解析的发病率。术后3,6,12小时的软组疼痛评分显着降低(P <0.001)。软组的第一种效果的时间明显更长(P <0.001)。结论柔软是一种可行的局部麻醉技术,用于控制术后不良事件的术后疼痛,与脊髓麻醉相比,使用Ilizarov外固定器进行胫骨骨折固定的患者。试用注册此试验在ClincinalTrials.gov批评性注册。注册表号:2018年2月20日NCT03450798。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoda Shokri; Amr A. Kasem;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2020
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号