首页> 外文OA文献 >The Science of Absent Evidence: Is There Such Thing as an Effective Responsible Drinking Message?
【2h】

The Science of Absent Evidence: Is There Such Thing as an Effective Responsible Drinking Message?

机译:缺乏证据的科学:是否有一种有效的负责任的饮酒信息?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: We conducted a systematic literature review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages (RDMs). Methods: We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar to June 2016 for studies evaluating the effectiveness of RDMs. Only eight studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Due to a small number of search results and broad inconsistency in methods and outcome measures, quantitative synthesis was not possible so a narrative summary of findings was conducted. Results: A review of findings from these articles suggested a disjointed approach in terms of the format and content of RDMs evaluated, as well as the dependent variables used to judge their effectiveness. An overall pattern emerged suggesting that RDMs may have beneficial effects across various outcome measures, including reducing prospective alcohol use. However, due to the inconsistent approach to both the development and evaluation of RDMs, it was not possible to draw any clear conclusions in terms of effectiveness, or indeed the potential size of any effects. Conclusions: A systematic approach to the development and evaluation of RDMs is recommended to ensure that a clearer evidence base is established in this area, particularly in light of the substantial public funds which are often spent on RDM campaigns.
机译:目的:我们对评估负责任饮酒信息(RDMS)的有效性进行了系统的文献综述。方法:我们搜索了Psycinfo,Medline和Google Scholar于2016年6月进行评估RDMS的有效性。只有八项研究达到了包含/排除标准。由于少量的搜索结果和方法和结果措施的广泛不一致,不可能进行定量合成,因此进行了调查结果的叙述概述。结果:对这些文章的调查结果审查表明,在评估的RDMS的格式和内容方面提出了脱节的方法,以及用于判断其有效性的依赖变量。表明RDMS在各种结果措施中可能具有有益效果的整体模式,包括降低预期酒精使用。但是,由于RDMS的开发和评估的方法不一致,因此无法在有效性方面吸取任何明确的结论,或者确实存在任何影响的潜在规模。结论:建议采取系统发展和评价的系统方法,以确保在该领域建立更清晰的证据基础,特别是鉴于经常在rdm竞选活动中花费的大量公共资金。

著录项

  • 作者

    Antony C Moss; Ian P Albery;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号