首页> 外文OA文献 >The Interwar Housing Cycle in the Light of 2001-2011: A Comparative Historical Approach
【2h】

The Interwar Housing Cycle in the Light of 2001-2011: A Comparative Historical Approach

机译:截至2001 - 2011年的白天的住房周期:比较历史方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Financial crisis of 2008 to 2009 and the Great Recession it precipitated forced a rethinking among macroeconomists about the origin, prevention, and potential mitigation of such events. One of the conclusions emerging from a considered examination of the run-up to and the fallout from the events is the limitation of framing the policy issues solely in terms of whether Chairman Bernanke and the Federal Reserve System, as well as President Obama and the Congress, did the right thing when the crisis hit. Most observers believe that the response to the immediate crisis was correct in the sense that they believe that the appropriate remedy, once the seizing up of credit markets began, was indeed large scale fiscal and monetary stimulus.As the Fed reduced short- term rates close to the zero lower bound, it almost tripled the size of its balance sheet, and this ongoing monetary accommodation was augmented by the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP, October 2008) and, beginning in February of 2009, the fiscal stimulus associated with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).1 The Republican takeover of the House of Representatives in the November 2010 midterm elections ended prospects for additional fiscal stimulus, at least from the expenditure side, but the Fed’s expansionary monetary stance continued as it sustained its expanded balance sheet, purchasing, through its programs of quantitative easing, longer term securities as some of the troubled assets acquired at the height of the crisis matured.Analysis of the appropriate response to the crisis drew inspiration from the experience of the country during the Great Depression. Two of the key policymakers, Christina Romer and Ben Bernanke, were both serious students of the Great Depression. Bernanke is famous for saying, at a 2002 conference honoring Milton Friedman on his 90th birthday, “Regarding the Great Depression, you’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry . . . we won’t do it again” (Bernanke 2002). Or to put it slightly more accurately, we won’t not do it again, since Friedman and Schwartz’s (1963) brief against the Fed was not their action, but their inaction in the face of bank failures and the consequent shrinkage in the country’s money supply.
机译:2008年至2009年的金融危机和巨大的经济衰退促使宏观经济学家迫使宏观经济论者的起源,预防和潜在减轻此类事件的影响。从考虑到事件的审查的结论中出现的结论之一是限制博纳克董事长和联邦储备制度以及奥巴马总统和国会的政策问题。 ,当危机击中时是正确的。大多数观察家认为,对立即危机的回应是正确的,他们认为他们认为适当的补救措施,一旦扣押信贷市场开始,确实是大规模的财政和货币刺激。美联储减少了短期税率关闭到零下界,它几乎增加了其资产负债表的大小,而且这种正在进行的货币住宿是由财政部陷入困境的资产救济计划(Tarp,2008年10月),并于2009年2月开始,与之相关的财政刺激美国恢复和再投资法案(ARRA).1 2010年11月中的共和党会议中议院的中期选举为额外财政刺激的前景持续前景,但美联储的扩张货币态度继续持续扩大资产负债表,采购,通过其定量宽松的计划,长期证券作为一些陷入困境的资产危机的高度成熟。对危机的适当反应分析,从大萧条中汲取了国家的经验。两个主要的政策制定者,克里斯蒂娜·罗梅尔和本伯南克,都是严肃的萧条的认真学生。 Bernanke以2002年的会议在他的90岁生日纪念米尔顿弗里德曼而闻名,“关于大萧条,你是对的,我们做到了。我们非常抱歉。 。 。我们不会再做一次“(Bernanke 2002)。或者将它稍微准确地放置,我们不会再这样做,因为弗里德曼和施瓦茨(1963年)对美联储的简要介绍并不是他们的行动,而是他们在银行失败面前的不作为和该国金钱的萎缩供应。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alexander Field;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号