首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large population‐based analysis
【2h】

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large population‐based analysis

机译:肺部大细胞神经内分泌癌的临床病理特征及预后因素:基于大量的人口分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The study was conducted to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and metastatic patterns between pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and other non‐small cell lung cancer (ONSCLC), and to identify the prognostic factors of LCNEC. Methods Data of patients diagnosed with LCNEC and ONSCLC from 2004 to 2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Pearson’s chi‐square tests were used to compare differences in clinicopathological characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis. A propensity score was used for matching and a Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate and subgroup analyses. Results A total of 2368 LCNEC cases and 231 672 ONSCLC cases were identified. LCNEC incidence increased slightly over time. Except for marital status, LCNEC patients had obviously different biological features to ONSCLC patients. Survival analysis showed that LCNEC had poorer outcomes than ONSCLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, black race, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were protective factors for LCNEC. Matched subgroup analysis further demonstrated that most subgroup factors favored ONSCLC, especially in early stage. Early‐stage LCNEC patients had a higher risk of lung cancer‐specific death than early‐stage ONSCLC patients. Moreover, metastatic patterns were different between LCNEC and ONSCLC. LCNEC patients with isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs had poorer survival rates. Conclusions LCNEC has totally different clinicopathological characteristics and metastatic patterns to ONSCLC. LCNEC also has poorer survival outcomes, primarily because of isolated liver metastasis or combined invasion to other organs. Most subgroup factors are adverse factors for LCNEC.
机译:背景技术进行该研究以比较肺部大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)和其他非小细胞肺癌(ONSCLC)之间的临床病理特征,生存结果和转移模式,并鉴定LCNEC的预后因素。方法从2004年至2014年诊断患有LCNEC和ONSCLC的患者的数据从监测,流行病学和最终结果数据集获得。 Pearson的Chi-Square测试用于比较临床病理特征的差异。 Kaplan-Meier方法用于存活分析。用于匹配的倾向分数,使用Cox比例危险模型用于多变量和亚组分析。结果共有2368例LCNEC案例和231个672个仓装案件。 LCNEC发病率随着时间的推移略有增加。除了婚姻状况外,LCNEC患者对ONSCLC患者具有明显不同的生物学特征。存活分析表明,LCNEC比ONSCLC更差。多变量分析显示,女性性别,黑种族,手术,辐射和化疗是LCNEC的保护因素。匹配的亚组分析进一步证明了大多数亚群因素有利于仓促,特别是在早期阶段。早期LCNEC患者的肺癌特异性患者的风险较高,比早期的肿瘤患者患者。此外,LCNEC和ONSCLC之间的转移模式不同。 LCNEC患者患有分离的肝脏转移或其他器官的联合入侵具有较差的存活率。结论LCNEC对ONSCLC具有完全不同的临床病理特征和转移模式。 LCNEC也具有较差的生存结果,主要是因为肝转移或与其他器官的结合入侵。大多数子组因素是LCNEC的不利因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号