首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety and efficacy of transpupillary silicone oil removal in combination with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery: comparison with 23-gauge approach
【2h】

Safety and efficacy of transpupillary silicone oil removal in combination with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery: comparison with 23-gauge approach

机译:与微安沉默乳化白内障手术结合的转膜硅油去除的安全性和有效性:与23号方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background To evaluate safety and efficacy of transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery, and to compare results of transpupillary with 23-gauge three-port vitrectomy approach. Methods Consecutive cases that underwent silicone oil removal using either transpupillary or three-port approach in combination with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The main outcome measures were postoperative detachment rate, silicone oil residuals, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results A total of 64 cases were included, 19 in transpupillary and 45 in three-port. Postoperative detachment rate within 3 months in transpupillary versus three-port was 15.8% versus 4.4% (p = 0.14), Silicone oil residuals was 7.4 ± 3.2% versus 7.1 ± 2.8% (transpupillary vs. three-port, p = 0.71). Preoperative versus postoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.49 ± 0.61 versus 1.42 ± 0.61 in transpupillary approach (p = 0.28) and 1.53 ± 0.48 versus 1.45 ± 0.57 in three-port approach (p = 0.11). Transpupillary approach resulted in lower IOP at postoperative day 2 (12.2 ± 2.3 mmHg vs. 13.5 ± 2.2 mmHg, p < 0.05), while postoperative follow-up at 1 month revealed no significant difference (p = 0.21). Conclusions Transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with micro-incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery is less invasive and can be an alternative in some circumstances.
机译:摘要背景,评价Transpupillary硅油除尘的安全性和疗效与微安沉默乳化白内障手术联合,并与23尺三端口玻璃体切除术的跨空间结果比较。方法回顾性地审查了使用跨膜或三端口方法使用跨膜或三端口方法进行硅油去除硅油去除的病例。回顾性地审查了微安沉淀性白内障手术。主要的结果措施是术后分离率,硅油残留,最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和眼压(IOP)。结果总共包括64例,19例跨空间和45个港口。 Transpupillary的3个月内的术后脱离率为15.8%,而4.4%(P = 0.14),硅油残留量为7.4±3.2%,而7.1±2.8%(Transpupillary Vs. Twor-Port,P = 0.71)。术前与术后BCVA(Logmar)为1.49±0.61与Transpupillary方法(p = 0.28)和1.53±0.48与三端口接近的1.45±0.57(p = 0.11)。术后第2天的IOP导致Transpupulary方法(12.2±2.3mmHg,5.5±2.2mmHg,P <0.05),同时在1个月的术后随访显示没有显着差异(P = 0.21)。结论Transpupilary硅油去除与微切除沉淀性白内障手术相结合,侵入性较少,可以在某些情况下是替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号