首页> 外文OA文献 >Property Outlaws in Cyberspace and Meatspace? Examining the Relationship between Online Peer Production and Support for Private Property Violations
【2h】

Property Outlaws in Cyberspace and Meatspace? Examining the Relationship between Online Peer Production and Support for Private Property Violations

机译:网络空间和肉空间的财产禁止栏吗?检查在线同行生产与私有财产违规的支持关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Marxian theory has long viewed the institution of private property as central to labour exploitation. After all, private property laws allow those who control the means of production to expropriate surplus value from the dispossessed. An analogous relationship arguably defines life on the Internet, where users are forced to venture onto privately owned digital enclosures to access key services. Yet these online property relationships are anything but settled and uncontested. Outside the digital enclosures of Apple and Google, the Internet has fostered the development of “commons-based peer production”, where key resources (e.g. software) are produced without anyone claiming exclusive property rights. In fact, some scholars have argued that the rise of peer production on the web has begun to re-shape popular attitudes concerning the legitimacy of property exclusions more broadly. In short, as we become “property outlaws” on the web, we come to question the inevitability and legitimacy of private property elsewhere in life. This paper explores this hypothesis by reporting data from a survey of Internet users at an East Coast university. Are users who engage in more peer production activities on the web also more likely to approve of “property outlaw” behaviours not just in the online context, but in the offline world as well (e.g. squatting)? The data provide only partial support for the hypothesis: active online peer producers were indeed more likely to support violations of intangible (intellectual) properties, but not violations of tangible or “real-world” properties.
机译:马克思主义理论已将私营财产的机构视为劳动力开发的核心。毕竟,私人财产法允许那些控制生产手段的人,以剥夺歧化的剩余价值。类似的关系可以说是在互联网上定义生活,用户被迫冒险进入私有的数字机箱以访问关键服务。然而,这些在线财产关系是且解决的任何东西都是无可争议的。互联网在苹果和谷歌的数字围栏之外促进了“基于共度的同行生产”的发展,其中关键资源(例如软件)未经任何人声称独家财产权。事实上,一些学者认为,网络上的同伴生产的崛起已经开始重塑流行态度,更广泛地重新塑造了物业排除的合法性。简而言之,我们成为网络上的“物业歹徒”,我们对生活中其他地方的私有财产的不可易熟和合法性提出质疑。本文通过在东海岸大学的互联网用户调查中报告数据来探讨这一假设。是否更有可能在网上参与更多同伴生产活动的用户也更有可能批准“物业歹徒”行为不仅在线上下文,而且在离线世界中(例如蹲)?这些数据仅提供了对该假设的部分支持:活动在线同行生产商确实更有可能支持违反无形(知识分子)属性,但不会违反有形或“现实世界”的物业。

著录项

  • 作者

    Timothy Gibson;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 22:24:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号