首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison Study on the Performances of Finite Volume Method and Finite Difference Method
【2h】

Comparison Study on the Performances of Finite Volume Method and Finite Difference Method

机译:有限体积法表演的比较研究与有限差分法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Vorticity-stream function method and MAC algorithm are adopted to systemically compare the finite volume method (FVM) and finite difference method (FDM) in this paper. Two typical problems—lid-driven flow and natural convection flow in a square cavity—are taken as examples to compare and analyze the calculation performances of FVM and FDM with variant mesh densities, discrete forms, and treatments of boundary condition. It is indicated that FVM is superior to FDM from the perspective of accuracy, stability of convection term, robustness, and calculation efficiency. Particularly ,when the mesh is coarse and taken as 20×20, the results of FDM suffer severe oscillation and even lose physical meaning.
机译:采用Vorticity-Stream功能方法和MAC算法来系统地比较本文的有限体积法(FVM)和有限差分法(FDM)。在方形腔中的两个典型问题 - 盖子流动和自然对流流量作为实施例,以比较和分析具有变体网格密度,离散形式和边界条件的处理的FVM和FDM的计算性能。结果表明,从准确度,对流术语,稳定性和计算效率的角度,FVM优于FDM。特别是,当网格粗糙并且被取向20×20时,FDM的结果遭受严重振荡,甚至失去了物理意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号