首页> 外文OA文献 >CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKS INTERACTION IN CLT-ADOPTED CLASSROOMS
【2h】

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKS INTERACTION IN CLT-ADOPTED CLASSROOMS

机译:CLT采用教室中的纠正反馈互动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This case study aimed to examine corrective feedback (CF) pattern in the interactions of Indonesian EFL (English as Foreign Language) classrooms (a speaking and a grammar classrooms) which adopt CLT (Communicative Language Teaching). Two lecturers and twenty undergraduate English department students of an A-class university in Indonesia were involved as research participants. The findings revealed that the lecturers employed all types of CF to treat all types of errors. Explicit corrections were dominant in Speaking class as well as other explicit CF; whereas reformulations and prompt were equally distributed. Elicitation was dominant in Grammar class as well as other prompts; meanwhile, explicit and implicit CFs had similar proportion. The lecturers’ preferences were based on their beliefs on how their students learn foreign language and some factors such as the importance of CF to the instructional focus of the lesson, the possibility to generate student’s uptake, and also their empathetic values about students’ current language development. It was concluded that the provisions of CF in EFL classrooms reflect the application of CLT.
机译:本案例研究旨在检查印度尼西亚EFL(英语作为外语)教室(A说话和语法教室)的纠正反馈(CF)模式,该教室采用CLT(交际语言教学)。印度尼西亚一大学的两位讲师和20名本科英语学生参与了研究参与者。调查结果显示,讲师使用各种类型的CF来治疗所有类型的错误。明确的更正在演讲课程中是占主导地位的,以及其他明确的CF;而重新装修和提示平均分布。诱导在语法课中占主导地位,以及其他提示;同时,显式和隐含的CFS具有相似的比例。讲师的偏好是基于他们对学生学习外语和一些因素的信念,例如CF对课程教学重点的重要性,可以产生学生的吸收,以及他们对学生当前语言的同情价值观发展。得出结论是,粮食委员会课堂中CF的规定反映了CLT的应用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ayu Liskinasih;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号