首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of cinnamomum cassia (CINNAMON) bark oil extraction through hydrodistillation (HD) and microwave assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD)
【2h】

A comparative study of cinnamomum cassia (CINNAMON) bark oil extraction through hydrodistillation (HD) and microwave assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD)

机译:通过加氢精馏(HD)和微波辅助加氢精馏(MAHD)提取肉桂肉桂(CINNAMON)树皮油的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of natural origin essential oils has recently gained much attention in many fields such as food flavouring, pesticides and in pharmaceutical industries. However, limitations to the use of existing conventional extraction methods are the inherent time consumption, high cost, high power consumption, potential loss of volatile compounds from essential oils as well as environmental concerns. Therefore new innovative extraction techniques are required to overcome these limitations. In this research, essential oil was extracted from Cinnamomum cassia bark using conventional hydrodistialltion (HD) and non-conventional microwave assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD) methods. The influence of pre-treatment on the C. cassia bark prior to extraction was investigated. Also, changes in morphology of the cinnamon bark powder before and after extraction by the two methods was observed through SEM. Milder disruption of cinnamon bark oil gland was observed for MAHD compared to HD. This is associated with the effective heat distribution obtainable from MAHD. The efficiency of MAHD extraction technique was compared with HD in terms of chemical composition and biological activity of the oil obtained as well as cost implication of the extraction process. To justify the performance of MAHD technique, the three main influencing factors such as solvent-to-plant material ratio, extraction time and irradiation microwave power were analysed. Analysis of these factors was initially carried out using one factor at a time (OFAT) method. Furthermore, screening and optimization of the factors was conducted with the help of Design expert software via factorial analysis and central composite design (CCD) respectively. The optimum conditions obtained through CCD for MAHD is 75 min extraction time, 8:1 of water to raw material ratio and 225 W irradiation power. The maximum yield obtained is 2.75 %. On the other hand, the extraction parameters for HD are 150 min extraction time, 8:1 of water to raw material ratio and a constant operating power of 350 W. The maximum yield obtained for HD is 2.02 %. The essential oil obtained at the optimum operating conditions for both methods was subjected to further qualitative analysis. Compositional analysis was conducted through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A total of 36 compounds were found for both extraction methods which were supported by FTIR analysis. However, the active compound present in C. cassia bark oil (trans-cinnamaldehyde) manifested a mean value of 84.43 ± 0.70 and 79.55 ± 0.45 for MAHD and HD respectively. Furthermore, cassia crude extract obtained through MAHD exhibits larger proportion of oxygenated compounds (9 % higher) than HD method. Energy consumption analysis shows that MAHD is more energy saving and environmental friendly. It reduced the overall carbon dioxide emission from HD by 59 %. In addition, cytotoxicity studies revealed that essential oil obtained through MAHD showed lower LC50 value (51.21 ppm) than HD (68.88 ppm). This indicates that the MAHD technique is suitable for obtaining volatile oils from cinnamon cassia bark and the oil obtained can offer great pharmaceutical benefits.
机译:最近,在食品调味料,农药和制药工业等许多领域,天然来源的精油的使用引起了广泛关注。但是,使用现有常规提取方法的局限性是固有的时间消耗,高成本,高功率消耗,精油中挥发性化合物的潜在损失以及对环境的关注。因此,需要新的创新提取技术来克服这些限制。在这项研究中,使用常规加氢蒸馏(HD)和非常规微波辅助加氢蒸馏(MAHD)方法从肉桂皮中提取香精油。研究了提取前预处理对决明子树皮的影响。另外,通过SEM观察到两种方法提取前后的肉桂皮粉末的形态变化。与HD相比,MAHD观察到肉桂皮油腺的轻度破坏。这与可从MAHD获得的有效热量分布有关。在获得的油的化学组成和生物活性以及萃取过程的成本方面,将MAHD萃取技术的效率与HD进行了比较。为了证明MAHD技术的合理性,分析了溶剂与植物材料的比例,萃取时间和辐照微波功率这三个主要影响因素。这些因素的分析最初是使用一次一个因素(OFAT)的方法进行的。此外,借助设计专家软件分别通过因子分析和中央复合设计(CCD)进行了因素的筛选和优化。通过CCD获得MAHD的最佳条件是提取时间为75分钟,水与原料的比例为8:1,照射功率为225W。获得的最大产率为2.75%。另一方面,用于HD的提取参数为150分钟的提取时间,水与原料的比例为8:1,恒定的工作功率为350W。HD的最大收率为2.02%。对两种方法在最佳操作条件下获得的精油进行了进一步的定性分析。通过气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)进行组成分析。两种提取方法共发现36种化合物,这得到了FTIR分析的支持。但是,肉桂果皮油中的活性化合物(反式肉桂醛)的MAHD和HD平均值分别为84.43±0.70和79.55±0.45。此外,通过MAHD获得的决明子粗提取物比HD方法显示出更大比例的含氧化合物(高9%)。能耗分析表明,MAHD更加节能环保。它使高清的二氧化碳排放总量减少了59%。此外,细胞毒性研究表明,通过MAHD获得的精油显示出的LC50值(51.21 ppm)低于HD(68.88 ppm)。这表明,MAHD技术适用于从肉桂决明树皮中获得挥发油,并且所获得的油可提供巨大的制药益处。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nitthiyah Jeyaratnam;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号