首页> 外文OA文献 >Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
【2h】

Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)

机译:美国规范(ACI 318-05)与英国标准(BS 8110-97)之间的钢筋混凝土设计比较研究

摘要

The application of American Codes (AC! 318-05) popular in the West Country, this is due to the design by using ACI Codes are more technically advanced and more safety.udCurrently beside Euro code, American Code also is one of design codes that widely use around the world, and it slowly become an important tool of communication inudConstruction field. Therefore in order to communicate well between the countries it is necessary to implement the American Code. However, the usages of ACI codes inudstructural building design are not as popular as expected in Malaysia. This is because perception and misunderstanding are still exists among the structural designer. Designer always think that there is not much difference while using the British Standard (BS 8110-ud97) as compare with ACT Codes (318-05). Therefore, a study was conducted to review design steps and also to explain technically design of column with ACT Codes. For a better understanding on ACI Codes design process, a work example of ACT Codes on column and comparison of area of reinforcement on several types of column has been done. In this research, the scope of the compare are only focus on the area of reinforcement required with varies of dimension and loading. The result has indicated that although the design process of ACT Codes is more technical but it is easy to understand because the design procedure is more details with the less of assumptions as compare to BS 8110. The result of the research was then show that the area of the required reinforcement of column while design using AC! Codes is almost similar with the column design in BS 8110.
机译:在西方国家流行的美国规范(AC!318-05)的应用,这是由于使用ACI规范进行的设计在技术上更先进,更安全。 ud当前,除了欧洲规范之外,美国规范也是设计规范之一在世界范围内广泛使用,并逐渐成为 udConstruction领域中的重要沟通工具。因此,为了在国家之间进行良好的沟通,有必要执行《美国法典》。但是,ACI代码在建筑结构设计中的使用并不像在马来西亚那样普遍。这是因为在结构设计人员中仍然存在感知和误解。设计师始终认为,使用英国标准(BS 8110- ud97)与ACT代码(318-05)并没有太大区别。因此,进行了一项研究,以审查设计步骤,并从技术上解释采用ACT代码的色谱柱设计。为了更好地理解ACI代码设计过程,已完成了ACT代码在柱上的工作示例以及几种类型的柱上钢筋面积的比较。在这项研究中,比较的范围仅集中在尺寸和载荷变化的所需加固区域上。结果表明,尽管ACT代码的设计过程更具技术性,但易于理解,因为与BS 8110相比,该设计过程更详细,假设更少。研究结果表明,该领域使用AC进行设计时所需的立柱加固!代码与BS 8110中的列设计几乎相似。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sia Kee Sieng;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号