首页> 外文OA文献 >Internal Audit Capability Level: Preliminary Study of Federal and State Statutory Body in Malaysian Public Sector Organizations
【2h】

Internal Audit Capability Level: Preliminary Study of Federal and State Statutory Body in Malaysian Public Sector Organizations

机译:内部审计能力水平:马来西亚公共部门组织中联邦和州法定机构的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to explain the importance of internal audit in enhancing the good governance of Malaysian public sector organizations. The primary objective is to determine the capability level of internal audit units of the different entities of organizations i.e. federal statutory body (CSA) and state statutory body (CSB). An explanatory case study method was used to collect the data whereby semi structured interviews, informal conversations, questionnaire and document reviews were conducted. It is found that CSA achieves overall capability level 2 with 76% achievement of key process areas (KPAs) while CSB only scores overall capability level 1 with 52% overall percentage achievement of KPAs. However, CSB scores higher percentage for respective elements of services and role of internal auditing, people management and performanceudmanagement and accountability compared to CSA. Instead, CSA scores 100% achievements of KPAs for other three dimensions i.e. professional practices, organizational relationships and culture and governance structure. There is a critical need to review the dimensions of services and role of internal audit and people management, for both organizations in order to enhance the effectiveness of the IA function. Implications and suggestions for further studies are also provided.
机译:本文的目的是解释内部审计对增强马来西亚公共部门组织的善治的重要性。主要目标是确定组织不同实体(即联邦法定机构(CSA)和州法定机构(CSB))的内部审核部门的能力水平。一种解释性的案例研究方法被用来收集数据,从而进行了半结构化访谈,非正式对话,问卷调查和文件审查。发现CSA以76%的关键过程区域(KPA)达到了整体能力级别2,而CSB仅以KPA的52%整体实现了整体能力级别1。但是,与CSA相比,CSB在服务的各个要素以及内部审计,人员管理,绩效管理和问责制方面的得分更高。取而代之的是,CSA在其他三个方面(即专业实践,组织关系以及文化和治理结构)对KPA的成就进行了100%的评分。迫切需要审查两个组织的服务范围以及内部审计和人员管理的作用,以增强内部审计职能的有效性。还提供了进一步研究的含义和建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号