首页> 外文OA文献 >Naturally selected honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies resistant to Varroa destructor do not groom more intensively
【2h】

Naturally selected honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies resistant to Varroa destructor do not groom more intensively

机译:自然选择的蜂蜜蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)殖民地抵抗Varroa Destructor不会更集中地培养

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is an important cause of high colony losses of the honey bee Apis mellifera. In The Netherlands, two resistant A. mellifera populations developed naturally after ceasing varroa control. As a result, mite infestation levels of the colonies of these populations are generally between 5–10%. However, the mechanisms behind mite resistance are still unclear. Since grooming behavior is a typical resistance trait that occurs in A. mellifera, we compared grooming between colonies of these two resistant populations and control colonies that had been treated against varroa twice a year in previous years. Grooming was investigated by measuring mite fall in broodless colonies in the field and in small cages with a fixed number of mites and bees in the lab. Furthermore, grooming was investigated at the individual level by measuring the effectiveness to remove dust by individual bees from the resistant and control colonies. We found that the grooming behavior of resistant colonies was unexpectedly equally or even less effective than that of control colonies. These results were supported by the effectiveness of individual bees to remove dust. Based on our results, we discuss that the trigger for grooming behavior may be density-dependent: grooming may be only beneficial at high mite infestation levels. Other resistance mechanisms than grooming are more likely to explain the varroa resistance of our two populations.
机译:异口酸螨Varroa析构探剂是蜂蜜蜂蒙皮菌菌落损失的重要原因。在荷兰,在停止Varroa控制后,两个抗性A. Mellifera群体自然发展。结果,这些群体的菌落的螨虫侵染水平通常在5-10%之间。然而,螨虫电阻背后的机制仍然不清楚。由于梳理行为是一种典型的抗性特征,即在A. mellifera中,我们将在这两种耐药群体和对照菌落的殖民地之间进行梳理,并在前几年每年两次治疗varroa治疗两次。通过测量领域的无骨殖民地,在实验室中的螨虫和蜜蜂数量的小笼子来调查美容。此外,通过测量来自抗性和控制菌落的单独蜂去除灰尘的有效性,在个人水平上进行修饰。我们发现,抗性菌落的修饰行为出乎意料地同等地或甚至比对照菌落的甚至更少有效。这些结果得到了单独蜜蜂去除粉尘的有效性。基于我们的结果,我们讨论了对散装行为的触发可能是密度依赖性的:梳理可能仅在高螨虫侵扰水平下有益。其他抗性机制更有可能解释我们两个人群的varroa抵抗力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号