首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Study of the Fit Accuracy of Full-Arch Bar Frameworks Fabricated with Different Presintered Cobalt-Chromium Alloys
【2h】

Comparative Study of the Fit Accuracy of Full-Arch Bar Frameworks Fabricated with Different Presintered Cobalt-Chromium Alloys

机译:采用不同预烧结钴铬合金制备的全拱形条形框架拟合精度的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. This study was to measure the geometric discrepancies that occur during the sintering contraction of presintered Co-Cr alloys in a full-arch bar framework and to compare the variations between alloys from different manufacturers. Materials and Methods. Eighteen implant-supported full-arch bar frameworks were fabricated through a soft-machining process using presintered Co-Cr alloy blocks: Ceramill Sintron (CS), Soft Metal (SM), and Sintermetall (SML) (n=6 for each group). The sintered frameworks were digitized using a structured light scanner, and the scan images were superimposed on the reference design. The geometric discrepancies of the sintered frameworks were three-dimensionally analyzed for horizontal, angular, and internal discrepancies. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare the discrepancies among the groups (α=.05). Results. Significant differences were found in the geometric discrepancy measurements among the groups. The CS group showed larger horizontal and angular discrepancies, followed by the SM and SML groups (P<.001). The root mean square (RMS) values for internal discrepancy were not statistically different among the groups (P=.778). Conclusion. The geometric discrepancies of full-arch bar frameworks fabricated using the soft-machining process were affected by accuracies in sintering contraction of presintered alloys.
机译:目的。该研究是测量全拱形条框架中预烧结的CO-CR合金的烧结过程中发生的几何差异,并比较来自不同制造商的合金之间的变化。材料和方法。通过使用预烧结的CO-CR合金块(Ceramill Sintron(CS),软金属(SM)和SintermetAll(SML)(每组n = 6)通过软加工过程来制造18个植入式全拱形栏框架。使用结构光扫描仪向烧结框架进行数字化,并且扫描图像叠加在参考设计上。烧结框架的几何差异对于水平,角度和内部差异三维分析。 Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U测试用于比较组中的差异(α= .05)。结果。在组中的几何差异测量中发现了显着的差异。 CS组显示出较大的水平和角度差异,其次是SM和SML组(P <.001)。内部差异的根均线(RMS)值在组中没有统计学上不同(P = .778)。结论。使用软加工过程制造的全拱形条框架的几何差异受预烧结合金烧结收缩的准确性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号