首页> 外文OA文献 >Ongoing evolution of proposal reviews in the Spitzer warm mission
【2h】

Ongoing evolution of proposal reviews in the Spitzer warm mission

机译:Spitzer热情任务中提案审核的持续发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Spitzer Space Telescope is executing the seventh year of extended warm mission science. The cryogenic mission operated from 2003 to 2009. The observing proposal review process has evolved from large, week-long, in-person meetings during the cryogenic mission to the introduction of panel telecon reviews in the warm mission. Further compression of the schedule and budget for the proposal solicitation and selection process led to additional changes in 2014. Large proposals are still reviewed at an in-person meeting but smaller proposals are no longer discussed by a topical science panel. This hybrid process, involving an in-person committee for the larger proposals and strictly external reviewers for the smaller proposals, has been successfully implemented through two observing cycles. While people like the idea of not having to travel to a review it is still the consensus opinion, in our discussions with the community, that the in-person review panel discussions provide the most satisfying result. We continue to use in-person reviews for awarding greater than 90% of the observing time.
机译:Spitzer太空望远镜正在执行扩展暖任务科学的第七年。低温任务的执行时间为2003年至2009年。观察提案的审核过程已经从低温任务期间为期一周的大型现场会议演变为在温暖的任务中引入面板式电信审核。 2014年提案征集和selection选流程的时间表和预算进一步压缩,导致在2014年进行了其他更改。大型提案仍在面对面会议上进行审核,但较小的提案不再由主题科学小组讨论。通过两个观察周期,成功地实施了这一混合流程,其中涉及较大提案的亲自委员会和较小提案的严格外部审核者。尽管人们喜欢不必进行审核的想法,但这仍然是共识,在我们与社区的讨论中,当面审核小组的讨论提供了最令人满意的结果。我们将继续使用面对面的评论来奖励90%以上的观察时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号