首页> 外文OA文献 >Role of 18-FDG/PET in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma managed locally by transarterial chemoembolization compared to triphasic computed tomography
【2h】

Role of 18-FDG/PET in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma managed locally by transarterial chemoembolization compared to triphasic computed tomography

机译:18-FDG / PET在评估Tryarterial Chemoembolization与Triphasic Computography评估肝细胞癌评估的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background This study was done to evaluate the role of FDG/PET compared to CECT in evaluating HCC after local interventional treatment. We evaluate forty-six patients with known history of TACE as a locoregional treatment of pathologically proved HCC. There were forty-three males and three females. Results The collected data were statistically analyzed, and we found that FDG-PET has a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 86.7%, negative predictive value of 86.4%, and accuracy of 93.4% in the detection of residual or recurrent at the managed tumor bed compared to CECT which shows a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 84%, positive predictive value of 86.7%, negative predictive value of 86.4%, and accuracy of 93.4 %). Combined views ( FDG-PET/CT ) are better in evaluation. Conclusion FDG-PET is better in the detection of residual or recurrence in HCC which is locally managed by TACE.
机译:摘要背景本研究是为了评估FDG / PET的作用与局部介入治疗后评估HCC的CECT相比。我们评估有46名患者,作为病理证明的HCC的招生治疗作为型号的TACE历史。有四十三个男性和三名女性。结果收集的数据在统计学上分析,我们发现FDG-PET的灵敏度为94%,特异性为84%,阳性预测值86.7%,负预测值86.4%,检测中的准确度为93.4%。与CECT相比,肿瘤床的残留或复发,表明敏感性为94%,特异性为84%,阳性预测值为86.7%,负预测值为86.4%,准确性为93.4%)。综合观点(FDG-PET / CT)评估更好。结论FDG-PET在HCC局部管理的HCC中的残留或复发中更好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Manal Ibraheim Gomaa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2020
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号