首页> 外文OA文献 >Voting on Growth Control Measures: Preferences and Strategies
【2h】

Voting on Growth Control Measures: Preferences and Strategies

机译:投票表决增长控制措施:偏好和策略

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Citizens of many California cities and counties have sought to restrict the rate of population growth in their localities. In 1988, Citizens for Limited Growth used the initiative process to place a pair of growth control measures on the ballot in the City and County of San Diego, respectively. The City Council and Board of Supervisors responded by placing less stringent, competing measures on the same ballot. This paper analyzes voting data from this election to examine the nature of support for such measures. We find strong support for the hypotheses that whites, homeowners, liberal/environmentalists, and those exposed to high levels of traffic congestion are more likely to favor growth controls. This paper also investigates the behavior of voters when they confront competing propositions concerning the same issue on the same ballot, and finds strong evidence of strategic voting.
机译:加州许多城市和县的公民都试图限制当地人口的增长率。 1988年,“有限增长的公民”利用该倡议程序在圣地亚哥市和圣迭戈县的选票上分别制定了一套增长控制措施。市议会和监事会的回应是,在同一投票中采取了不那么严格的竞争性措施。本文分析了此次选举的投票数据,以检验支持此类措施的性质。我们发现白人,房主,自由主义者/环境主义者以及交通拥堵程度高的人更倾向于控制增长的假设得到了强有力的支持。本文还研究了选民在相同选票上面对有关同一问题的竞争性主张时的行为,并找到了进行战略投票的有力证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号