首页> 外文OA文献 >Talking About My Generation: the Date of the West Kennet Long Barrow
【2h】

Talking About My Generation: the Date of the West Kennet Long Barrow

机译:谈论我的一代:西肯纳特长宝库的日期

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Thirty-one radiocarbon results are now available from the West Kennet long barrow, and are presented within an interpretive Bayesian statistical framework. Two alternative archaeological interpretations of the sequence are given, each with a separate Bayesian model. In our preferred interpretation, the barrow is seen as a unitary construction (given the lack of dating samples from the old ground surface, ditches or constructional features themselves), with a series of deposits of human remains made in the chambers following construction. Primary deposition in the chambers is followed by further secondary deposition of some human remains, including children, and layers of earth and chalk, the latest identifiable finds in which are Beaker sherds. In the Bayesian model for this sequence, the construction of the monument at West Kennet, as dated from the primary mortuary deposits, occurred in 3670–3635 cal. BC, probably in the middle decades of the thirty-seventh century cal. BC. The last interments of this initial use of the chambers probably occurred in 3640–3610 cal. BC. The difference between these two distributions suggests that this primary mortuary activity probably continued for only 10–30 years. After a hiatus probably lasting for rather more than a century, the infilling of the chambers began in 3620–3240 cal. BC and continued into the second half of the third millennium cal. BC. In an alternative interpretation, we do not assume that all the people dated from the primary mortuary deposits were placed in the monument in a fleshed or partially articulated condition; they could therefore have died before the monument was built, although they must have died before the end of the formation of the mortuary deposit. In the Bayesian model for this interpretation, the monument appears to belong either to the thirty-seventh century cal. BC or the mid-thirty-sixth century cal. BC, and deposition again appears short-lived, but the model is unstable. Results are discussed in relation to the setting and sequence of the local region.
机译:现在可以从西肯尼特长手推车获得31个放射性碳的结果,并将其解释为解释性的贝叶斯统计框架。给出了该序列的两种不同的考古学解释,每种解释都有各自的贝叶斯模型。在我们的首选解释中,手推车被视为一体的结构(由于缺少来自旧地面,沟渠或自身构造特征的年代样本),因此在建造后的小室中沉积了一系列人类遗骸。在腔室中进行初步沉积后,再进一步沉积一些人类遗骸,包括儿童,土层和白垩层,其中最新的可识别发现是烧杯。在此序列的贝叶斯模型中,从原始太平间矿床开始,在西肯内特建造纪念碑的时间是3670–3635 cal。公元前,可能在公元37世纪中叶。公元前。最初使用室的最后间隔可能发生在3640–3610 cal。公元前。这两种分布之间的差异表明,这种最初的葬活动可能仅持续了10至30年。中断可能持续了一个多世纪之后,这些腔室的填充开始于3620-3240 cal。公元前,并一直持续到第三个千年的下半年。公元前。在另一种解释中,我们不假定所有来自原始葬场所的人都以肉体或部分关节的状态被放置在纪念碑中。因此,他们可能在建造纪念碑之前就已经死了,尽管他们一定在太平间形成结束之前就已经死了。在这种解释的贝叶斯模型中,该纪念碑似乎属于三十七世纪的卡尔。公元前或三十六世纪中叶。 BC,并且沉积再次出现是短暂的,但是模型不稳定。讨论了有关局部区域的设置和顺序的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号