首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the Structure of Human Defensive Responses from Judgments of Threat Scenarios
【2h】

Exploring the Structure of Human Defensive Responses from Judgments of Threat Scenarios

机译:从威胁情景判断中探索人类防御反应的结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

How humans react to threats is a topic of broad theoretical importance, and also relevant for understanding anxiety disorders. Many animal threat reactions exhibit a common structure, a finding supported by human evaluations of written threat scenarios that parallel patterns of rodent defensive behavior to actual threats. Yet the factors that underlie these shared behavioral patterns remain unclear. Dimensional accounts rooted in Darwin’s conception of antithesis explain many defensive behaviors. Across species, it is also clear that defensive reactions depend on specific situational factors, a feature long emphasized by psychological appraisal theories. Our study sought to extend prior investigations of human judgments of threat to a broader set of threats, including natural disasters, threats from animals, and psychological (as opposed to physical) threats. Our goal was to test whether dimensional and specific patterns of threat evaluation replicate across different threat classes. 85 healthy adult subjects selected descriptions of defensive behaviors that indicated how they would react to 29 threatening scenarios. Scenarios differed with respect to ten factors, e.g., perceived dangerousness or escapability. Across scenarios, we correlated these factor ratings with the pattern of defensive behaviors subjects endorsed. A decision tree hierarchically organized these correlation patterns to successfully predict each scenario’s most common reaction, both for the original sample of subjects and a separate replication group (n = 22). At the top of the decision tree, degree of dangerousness interacted with threat type (physical or psychological) to predict dimensional approach/avoidance behavior. Subordinate nodes represented specific defensive responses evoked by particular contexts. Our ecological approach emphasizes the interplay of situational factors in evoking a broad range of threat reactions. Future studies could test predictions made by our results to help understand pathological threat processing, such as seen in anxiety disorders, and could begin to test underlying neural mechanisms.
机译:人类如何对威胁做出反应是一个具有广泛理论意义的主题,并且与理解焦虑症有关。许多动物威胁反应具有共同的结构,这一发现得到了人类对书面威胁情景的评估的支持,该评估将啮齿动物防御行为的模式与实际威胁平行。然而,这些共同的行为模式背后的因素仍然不清楚。扎根于达尔文对立概念的量纲解释了许多防御行为。在整个物种中,很明显防御反应取决于特定的情境因素,这是心理评估理论长期强调的特征。我们的研究试图将对威胁的人类判断的先前调查扩展到更广泛的威胁,包括自然灾害,动物威胁和心理(而非物理)威胁。我们的目标是测试威胁评估的维度和特定模式是否在不同威胁类别之间重复。 85名健康的成年人受试者选择了防御行为的描述,这些行为表明了他们将如何应对29种威胁情景。场景在十个因素方面有所不同,例如,感知到的危险性或可逃避性。在各种情况下,我们将这些因素评分与受试者认可的防御行为模式相关联。决策树对这些相关模式进行了分层组织,以成功预测每种情况下最原始的反应,包括原始受试者样本和单独的复制组(n = 22)。在决策树的顶部,危险程度与威胁类型(身体或心理)相互作用,以预测尺寸进近/避免行为。下级节点表示由特定上下文引起的特定防御响应。我们的生态学方法在引发广泛的威胁反应时强调情境因素的相互作用。未来的研究可能会测试我们的结果所做出的预测,以帮助理解病理性威胁的处理过程,例如在焦虑症中所见,并且可能会开始测试潜在的神经机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号