首页> 外文OA文献 >Inequalities in mental health and well-being in a time of austerity: Follow-up findings from the Stockton-on-Tees cohort study
【2h】

Inequalities in mental health and well-being in a time of austerity: Follow-up findings from the Stockton-on-Tees cohort study

机译:心理健康和幸福的不平等在紧缩时期:斯托克斯 - 赛车队的跟进调查结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In response to the 2007/8 financial crisis and the subsequent ‘Great Recession’, the UK government pursued a policy of austerity, characterised by public spending cuts and reductions in working-age welfare benefits. This paper reports on a case study of the effects of this policy on local inequalities in mental health and wellbeing in the local authority of Stockton-on-Tees in the North East of England, an area with very high spatial and socio-economic inequalities. Follow-up findings from a prospective cohort study of the gap in mental health and wellbeing between the most and least deprived neighbourhoods of Stockton-on-Tees is presented. It is the first quantitative study to use primary data to intensively and longitudinally explore local inequalities in mental health and wellbeing during austerity and it also examines any changes in the underpinning social and behavioural determinants of health. Using a stratified random sampling technique, the data was analysed using linear mixed effects model (LMM) that explored any changes in the gap in mental health and wellbeing between people from the most and least deprived areas, alongside any changes in the material, psychosocial and behavioural determinants. The main findings are that the significant gap in mental health between the two areas remained constant over the 18-month study period, whilst there were no changes in the underlying determinants. These results may reflect our relatively short follow-up period or the fact that the cohort sample were older than the general population and pensioners in the UK have largely been protected from austerity. The study therefore potentially provides further empirical evidence to support assertions that social safety nets matter - particularly in times of economic upheaval. Keywords: Social determinants, Survey, Mental wellbeing, Health inequalities, Welfare, Social inequality, Austerity
机译:为了回应2007/8金融危机和随后的“巨大衰退”,英国政府采取紧缩政策,以公共支出减少和减少工作年龄福利利益为特征。本文报告了本协会对英格兰东北地区斯托斯顿对斯托斯乐健康和福祉局部权威的局部不平等的案例研究,该地区具有非常高的空间和社会经济不平等。提出了一部分队列的后续调查结果,对斯托克上最少贫困的斯托克上的群体健康和福祉之间的差距进行了研究。这是第一个定量研究使用的主要数据集中和纵向探讨心理健康和紧缩期间福利当地的不平等,同时也考察了健康的托底社会和行为因素的任何变化。使用分层的随机采样技术,使用线性混合效应模型(LMM)分析数据,该模型(LMM)探讨了从最低和最少的剥夺区域之间的心理健康和福祉之间的差距变化,以及物质,心理社会和的任何变化行为决定因素。主要研究结果是,在18个月的研究期间,两个地区的心理健康状况的显着差距仍然不变,同时潜在的决定因素没有变化。这些结果可能反映了我们相对较短的随访期或队列样本比英国普通人口和养恤金者大的事实主要受到紧缩的影响。因此,该研究可能提供进一步的经验证据来支持社会安全网关的断言 - 特别是在经济动荡时期。关键词:社会决定因素,调查,心理健康,健康不平等,福利,社会不平等,紧缩

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号