This study examines whether it would be better to deploy a velocity-recording strong-motion instrument in place of existing force-balance accelerometers. The proposed instrument would be comparable to a low-gain version of existing broadband seismometers. Using a large suite of Earth signals, we compare such a hypothetical long-period low-gain velocity seismometer (with a clipping level set to ±5 m/s) with the existing ±2 g clipping Kinemetrics FBA-23 accelerometer. ududWe show that there are significant advantages in the deployment of the proposed instrument over an accelerometer.ududud
展开▼
机译：这项研究研究了用速度记录强运动仪器代替现有的力平衡加速度计是否更好。拟议的仪器将与现有宽带地震仪的低增益版本相当。我们使用大量的地球信号，将这种假想的长周期低增益速度地震仪（限幅水平设置为±5 m / s）与现有的±2 g限幅Kinemetrics FBA-23加速度计进行了比较。 ud ud我们证明，与加速度计相比，所提出的仪器的部署具有显着优势。 ud ud ud
展开▼
