首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study of Wenner and Schlumberger electrical resistivity method for groundwater investigation: a case study from Dhule district (M.S.), India
【2h】

Comparative study of Wenner and Schlumberger electrical resistivity method for groundwater investigation: a case study from Dhule district (M.S.), India

机译:Wenner和Schlumberger电阻率法对地下水调查的比较研究 - 以印度Dhule区(M.)为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract The area chosen for the present study is Dhule district, which belongs to the drought prone area of Maharashtra State, India. Dhule district suffers from water problem, and therefore, there is no extra water available to supply for the agricultural and industrial growth. To understand the lithological characters in terms of its hydro-geological conditions, it is necessary to understand the geology of the area. It is now established fact that the geophysical method gives a better information of subsurface geology. Geophysical electrical surveys with four electrodes configuration, i.e., Wenner and Schlumberger method, were carried out at the same selected sites to observe the similarity and compared both the applications in terms of its use and handling in the field. A total 54 VES soundings were carried out spread over the Dhule district and representing different lithological units. The VES curves are drawn using inverse slope method for Wenner configuration, IPI2 win Software, and curve matching techniques were used for Schlumberger configuration. Regionwise lithologs are prepared based on the obtained resistivity and thickness for Wenner method. Regionwise curves were prepared based on resistivity layers for Schlumberger method. Comparing the two methods, it is observed that Wenner and Schlumberger methods have merits or demerits. Considering merits and demerits from the field point of view, it is suggested that Wenner inverse slope method is more handy for calculation and interpretation, but requires lateral length which is a constrain. Similarly, Schlumberger method is easy in application but unwieldy for their interpretation. The work amply proves the applicability of geophysical techniques in the water resource evaluation procedure. This technique is found to be suitable for the areas with similar geological setup elsewhere.
机译:摘要本研究选择的区域是Duhule区,属于印度马哈拉施特拉邦的干旱普通区。 Dhule District遭受了水问题,因此,农业和工业增长没有额外的水。要了解其水力地质条件方面的岩性特征,有必要了解该地区的地质。现在建立了地球物理方法提供了更好的地质地质信息。具有四个电极配置的地球物理电气调查,即Wenner和Schlumberger方法,在相同的选定地点进行,以观察相似性,并在其使用和处理领域的应用方面进行了比较。共有54个VES探测在Duhule区传播并代表不同的岩性单位。使用用于Wenner配置的反斜斜率方法,使用IPI2 Win软件和曲线匹配技术来绘制VES曲线,用于Schlumberger配置。基于所获得的Wenner方法的电阻率和厚度来制备邻域光滑型。基于用于舒尔伯格方法的电阻率层制备区域曲线。比较这两种方法,观察到Wenner和Schlumberger方法具有优点或缺点。考虑到场景的优点和缺点,建议Wenner逆斜率方法更方便地用于计算和解释,但需要横向长度,但是是约束的横向长度。同样,Schlumberger方法在应用中很容易,但对他们的解释令人难以忍受。该工作充分阐明了地球物理技术在水资源评估程序中的适用性。发现该技术适用于其他地方具有类似地质设置的区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号