首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of ER-2 aircraft and POAM III, MLS, and SAGE II satellite measurements during SOLVE using traditional correlative analysis and trajectory hunting technique
【2h】

Comparison of ER-2 aircraft and POAM III, MLS, and SAGE II satellite measurements during SOLVE using traditional correlative analysis and trajectory hunting technique

机译:使用传统的相关分析和轨迹搜索技术比较ER-2飞机和SOLVE期间POAM III,MLS和SAGE II卫星的测量结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared the version 5 Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), version 3 Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III), version 6.0 Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (SAGE II), and NASA ER-2 aircraft measurements made in the Northern Hemisphere in January–February 2000 during the SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). This study addresses one of the key scientific objectives of the SOLVE campaign, namely, to validate multiplatform satellite measurements made in the polar stratosphere during winter. This intercomparison was performed by using a traditional correlative analysis (TCA) and a trajectory hunting technique (THT). TCA compares profiles colocated within a chosen spatial-temporal vicinity. Launching backward and forward trajectories from the points of measurement, the THT identifies air parcels sampled at least twice within a prescribed match criterion during the course of 5 days. We found that the ozone measurements made by these four instruments agree most of the time within ±10% in the stratosphere up to 1400 K (∼35 km). The water vapor measurements from POAM III and the ER-2 Harvard Lyman α hygrometer and Jet Propulsion Laboratory laser hygrometer agree to within ±0.5 ppmv (or about ±10%) in the lower stratosphere above 380 K. The MLS and ER-2 ClO measurements agree within their error bars for the TCA. The MLS and ER-2 nitric acid measurements near 17- to 20-km altitude agree within their uncertainties most of the time with a hint of a positive offset by MLS according to the TCA. We also applied the Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. box model constrained by the ER-2 measurements for analysis of the ClO and HNO3 measurements using the THT. We found that: (1) the model values of ClO are smaller by about 0.3–0.4 (0.2) ppbv below (above) 400 K than those by MLS and (2) the HNO3 comparison shows a positive offset of MLS values by ∼1 and 1–2 ppbv below 400 K and near 450 K, respectively. Our study shows that, with some limitations (like HNO3 comparison under polar stratospheric cloud conditions), the THT is a more powerful tool for validation studies than the TCA, making conclusions of the comparison statistically more robust.
机译:我们比较了第5版微波四肢测深仪(MLS),第3版极地臭氧和气溶胶测量III(POAM III),第6.0版平流层气溶胶和气体实验II(SAGE II),以及在北半球进行的NASA ER-2飞机的测量。在2000年1月至2月的SAGE III臭氧损失和验证实验(SOLVE)中进行。这项研究解决了SOLVE运动的关键科学目标之一,即验证冬季在极地平流层中进行的多平台卫星测量。这种比较是通过使用传统的相关分析(TCA)和轨迹搜寻技术(THT)进行的。 TCA比较在所选时空附近并置的轮廓。 THT从测量点开始向后和向前移动,在5天的过程中,根据规定的匹配标准,至少两次采样的空气包裹被识别。我们发现,在1400 K(〜35 km)的平流层中,这四种仪器进行的臭氧测量大部分时间都在±10%的范围内。来自POAM III和ER-2哈佛莱曼α湿度计以及喷射推进实验室激光湿度计的水蒸气测量值在380 K以上的低平流层中均在±0.5 ppmv(或约±10%)之内。MLS和ER-2 ClO测量结果在其TCA误差条内一致。根据TCA,在大多数情况下,海拔17至20公里处的MLS和ER-2硝酸测量值在不确定性范围内一致,暗示了MLS的正偏差。我们还应用了受ER-2测量约束的Atmospheric and Environmental Research,Inc.盒模型来分析使用THT的ClO和HNO3测量。我们发现:(1)ClO的模型值在400 K以下(高于400 K)要比MLS的模型值小0.3–0.4(0.2)ppbv左右;(2)HNO3比较显示MLS值有正偏差〜1在400 K以下和450 K附近分别为1-2 ppbv。我们的研究表明,在某些限制下(例如在极地平流层云条件下进行HNO3比较),THT比TCA是用于验证研究的更强大工具,从而使比较的结论在统计上更加可靠。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号