首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models
【2h】

‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models

机译:“可持续”而不是“生存”粮食不安全的粮食援助解决方案:南澳大利亚受助人对传统和社会企业模型的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

South Australian (SA) food charity recipients’ perspectives were sought on existing services and ideas for improvement of food assistance models to address food insecurity. Seven focus groups were conducted between October and November 2017 with 54 adults. Thematically analysed data revealed five themes: (1) Emotional cost and consequences of seeking food relief; (2) Dissatisfaction with inaccessible services and inappropriate food; (3) Returning the favour—a desire for reciprocity; (4) Desiring help beyond food; and, (5) “It’s a social thing”, the desire for social interaction and connection. Findings revealed that some aspects of the SA food assistance services were disempowering for recipients. Recipients desired more empowering forms of food assistance that humanise their experience and shift the locus of control and place power back into their hands. Some traditional models, such as provision of supermarket vouchers, empower individuals by fostering autonomy and enabling food choice in socially acceptable ways. Improvement in the quality of existing food assistance models, should focus on recipient informed models which re-dress existing power relations. Services which are more strongly aligned with typical features of social enterprise models were generally favoured over traditional models. Services which are recipient-centred, strive to empower recipients and provide opportunities for active involvement, social connection and broader support were preferred.
机译:南澳大利亚(SA)食品慈善机构的观点是寻求现有服务和思想改善粮食援助模式,以解决粮食不安全。 2017年10月和2017年11月在2017年12月之间进行了七个焦点小组。主题分析数据显示了五个主题:(1)寻求食物救济的情绪成本和后果; (2)对难以接近的服务和不恰当的食物不满; (3)回报对互惠的渴望; (4)渴望超越食物;而且,(5)“这是一个社交事物”,对社会互动和联系的渴望。调查结果显示,SA粮食援助服务的某些方面对受助人的责任。受人员所需的更具赋权形式的粮食援助,使他们的经验人性化并将控制轨迹转移到他们的手中。一些传统模式,例如提供超市优惠券,通过培养自治,使食物选择能够以社会可接受的方式实现。完善现有食品援助模式的质量,应专注于收件人知情模特,重新连衣技术。与社会企业模型的典型特征更强烈对齐的服务通常受传统模型的青睐。作为受援者为中心的服务,努力赋予收件人,并为主动参与,社会联系和更广泛的支持提供机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号