首页> 外文OA文献 >Observational Application Comparing Problem-Based Learning with the Conventional Teaching Method for Clinical Acupuncture Education
【2h】

Observational Application Comparing Problem-Based Learning with the Conventional Teaching Method for Clinical Acupuncture Education

机译:与临床针灸教育的传统教学方法比较基于问题的学习的观察应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim. Although the problem-based learning (PBL) teaching method was introduced in 1969, its rapid and widespread application in Malaysia started in 1979. This study aimed to evaluate satisfaction with PBL compared to that of conventional learning, using satisfaction surveys and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scores, of students learning clinical acupuncture at the School of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Xiamen University Malaysia. Method. The participants of this study (N=36) were registered for a bachelor’s degree program in TCM in 2016 and enrolled in the Science of Acupuncture and Moxibustion course beginning in September 2018. The students were randomly allocated into two groups: PBL group and conventional group. A self-administered learning satisfaction survey and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scores were used for data collection. An independent sample t-test was used to compare the results between the two groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results. The results of the learning satisfaction survey and Rosenberg Self-Esteem scores were significantly better in the PBL group than in the conventional group (p<0.05). Conclusions. PBL appears to be more effective for clinical acupuncture education than the conventional teaching method. However, further studies are needed to identify the mechanisms by which PBL excels in clinical acupuncture education, as well as other related TCM fields.
机译:目的。尽管1969年引入了基于问题的学习(PBL)教学方法,但在马来西亚的快速和广泛应用于1979年。该研究旨在与常规学习相比,使用满意调查和罗森伯格自我来评估PBL的满意度学生学习临床针灸在中医学院(TCM),厦门大学马来西亚。方法。本研究的参与者(N = 36)于2016年在中医学位方案中注册,并于2018年9月开始注册针灸课程科学。学生被随机分配成两组:PBL组和常规组。自我管理的学习满意度调查和罗森伯格自尊分数用于数据收集。使用独立的样品T检验来比较两组之间的结果。 p值<0.05被认为是显着的。结果。在PBL组中,学习满意度调查和Rosenberg自尊评分的结果比常规组在常规组中显着更好(P <0.05)。结论。 PBL似乎对临床针灸教育似乎比传统教学方法更有效。然而,需要进一步的研究来鉴定PBL Excel在临床针灸教育以及其他相关中医领域的机制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yun Jin Kim;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号