首页> 外文OA文献 >Revisiting the AMBA AHB bus case study
【2h】

Revisiting the AMBA AHB bus case study

机译:回顾AMBA AHB巴士案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This report describes a number of changes to the ARM AMBA bus case study from Bloem et al. that lead to significant reduction in synthesis time. In addition, it identifies the reason of blowup for the synthesized strategies in earlier studies as lack of binary decision diagram (BDD) reordering during strategy construction. Enabling dynamic BDD reordering with the group sifting algorithm, we synthesized strategies for as many as 18 masters, with both the original and revised specifications. This conclusion is based on detailed experimental measurements that show the changes of BDD sizes over time for the fixpoint and other variables during the nested fixed point computation, including the cumulative time spent on BDD reordering and the total number of BDD nodes. The measurements were obtained for eight different cases, allowing to compare the original with the revised specifications, with strategy reordering enabled or not, and conjoining the weak fairness guarantees or merging them into a single Büchi automaton. The revised specification proposed here is expressed using the open Promela language.
机译:该报告描述了Bloem等人对ARM AMBA总线案例研究的许多更改。从而大大减少了合成时间。此外,它确定了早期研究中合成策略出现爆炸的原因是在策略构建过程中缺少二进制决策图(BDD)重新排序。通过使用组筛选算法来实现动态BDD重新排序,我们综合了多达18个母版的策略,包括原始规范和修订版规范。该结论基于详细的实验测量结果,这些测量结果显示了嵌套固定点计算过程中固定点和其他变量的BDD大小随时间的变化,包括花费在BDD重新排序上的累积时间和BDD节点的总数。针对八种不同情况获得了测量结果,从而可以将原始数据与修订后的规范进行比较,并启用或不启用策略重新排序,并结合弱的公平保证或将它们合并为单个Büchi自动机。此处提出的修订规范是使用开放的Promela语言表达的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号