首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Global Cognition in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions for Global Cognition in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:温和认知障碍患者对全球认知干预措施的比较有效性:随机对照试验的系统审查与网络荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: There is a lack of study comprehensively comparing the effects of all existing types of interventions on global cognition among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Aims: To conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of interventions in improving global cognition among MCI patients.Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in MCI patients were included. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the data. Random-effects network meta-analysis was used to synthesize the data. Results were summarized as mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% CIs of MMSE in forest plots.Results: Fifty RCTs with 5,944 MCI patients met the inclusion criteria and 49 were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, cognition-based intervention (MD = 0.80, 95% CI 0.04–1.57), physical exercise (MD = 1.92, 95% CI 1.19–2.64), combined physical exercise and cognition-based intervention (MD = 1.86, 95% CI 0.60–3.12), and antioxidants (MD = 0.94, 95% CI 0.04–1.83) had positive effects on MMSE in participants with MCI. There was no significant difference between all other interventions included and the control group.Conclusions: This study suggested that cognition-based intervention, physical exercise, combined physical exercise and cognition-based intervention, and antioxidants could be among the most effective interventions on global cognition in older adults with MCI. The availability, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of interventions should also be taken into consideration when selecting interventions.Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020171985.
机译:背景:缺乏研究全面比较所有现有类型的干预措施对温和认知障碍患者的全球认知的影响(MCI)。遗迹:进行网络元分析,以评估不同类型的干预措施的有效性在MCI患者中提高全球认知。方法:评估药理学或非药理学干预对MCI患者迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者独立筛选了研究并提取了数据。随机效应网络元分析用于综合数据。结果总结为平均差异(MD)和相应的森林地块中的MMSE 95%CIS.Results:5,944名MCI患者的五十个RCT符合纳入标准,49次纳入网络元分析。与对照组相比,基于认知的干预(MD = 0.80,95%CI 0.04-1.57),体育锻炼(MD = 1.92,95%CI 1.19-2.64),组合体育运动和基于认知的干预(MD = 1.86 ,95%CI 0.60-3.12)和抗氧化剂(MD = 0.94,95%CI 0.04-1.83)对MCI参与者的MMSE对MMSE进行了积极影响。所有其他干预措施和对照组之间没有显着差异。结论:本研究表明,基于认知的干预,体育锻炼,综合运动和认知的干预,以及抗氧化剂可能是全球认知的最有效的干预措施之一在带MCI的老年人。选择干预措施时,还应考虑干预措施的可用性,可接受性和成本效益。重复:Prospero CRD42012191985。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号