首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of Crop Diversity on Dietary Diversity Among Farmers in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic
【2h】

Impact of Crop Diversity on Dietary Diversity Among Farmers in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic

机译:作物多样性对Covid-19大流行期间印度农民饮食多样性的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Crop diversity is thought to have small, positive impacts on dietary diversity among farming households, particularly when market access is restricted. Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic severely restricted market access. To date, no study has explored the relationship between crop and dietary diversity in this context. To address this gap, we used longitudinal data collected from 833 farmers across 12 states in India at three time points between May and August 2020. Dietary diversity was measured using a modified version of the FAO Minimum Dietary Diversity score for women, which has been used in representative samples of the Indian population in both men and women. Eight food groups were included: (1) starchy staples (rice, wheat, and potatoes), (2) pulses, (3) nuts, (4) vegetables, (5) fruits, (6) dairy, (7) eggs, and (8) fleshy foods (meat, poultry, and fish). Multivariate polynomial logistic regression was used to estimate the association between crop and dietary diversity. Models were adjusted for educational attainment, caste, farm size, having a kitchen garden, and livestock ownership. Participants were, on average, 42.2 years old and 94.2% were male. Dietary diversity decreased over the study period, especially between baseline and follow-up 1, when lockdown measures were the most restrictive (34.2% of participants experienced a decline compared to 16.1% from follow-up 1 to follow-up 2). Compared to farmers who cultivated 1 crop (monocroppers), farmers who cultivated 2 crops or 3 or more crops were significantly less likely to experience a decline in dietary diversity from baseline to follow-up 1: adjusted relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval [CI]), 0.52 (0.35, 0.78) and 0.48 (0.31, 0.75), respectively. There was no significant association between crop diversity and change in dietary diversity from follow-up 1 to follow-up 2, when phased re-opening had begun. These findings suggest that farmers with greater crop diversity in India were more resilient to market disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, while the links between crop and dietary diversity may be small under normal circumstances, diversifying production systems may play an increasingly important role, as there is greater uncertainty due to global events such as pandemics and climate change.
机译:裁定多样性被认为对农户之间的饮食多样性进行了小,积极的影响,特别是当市场准入受到限制时。对Covid-19大流行严重限制的市场准入的政策回应。迄今为止,在这种背景下,尚未研究作物和饮食多样性之间的关系。为了解决这一差距,我们在5月20日和8月20日期间的三个时间点使用了在印度的12个州的833名农民中收集的纵向数据。使用已使用的粮农组织的最低饮食多样性分数的修改版本测量膳食多样性在男女印度人群的代表性样本中。包括八个食物组:(1)淀粉钉(米,小麦和土豆),(2)脉冲,(3)螺母,(4)蔬菜,(5)水果,(6)乳制品,(7)鸡蛋, (8)肉质食物(肉,家禽和鱼)。多变量多项式逻辑回归用于估计作物与饮食多样性之间的关联。适用于教育程度,种姓,农场规模,厨房花园和牲畜所有权调整模型。参与者平均为42.2岁,94.2%是男性。膳食多样性在研究期内减少,特别是基线与后续1之间,当锁定措施是最严格的时(34.2%的参与者经历了下降,与随访的后续行动增加2)。与培养1作物(独一无二的人)的农民相比,培养2种作物或3种或更多作物的农民在基线到后续行动的饮食多样性的可能性显着不太可能在1:相对风险(RR)(95%的信心95%间隔[CI]),0.52(0.35,0.78)和0.48(0.31,0.75)。当相算的重新开业开始时,作物多样性与随访2的后续行动后的饮食多样性之间没有重大关联。这些调查结果表明,在印度越来越多的作物多样性的农民对Covid-19大流行中的市场中断更加有弹性。因此,虽然作物和饮食多样性之间的联系在正常情况下可能很小,但多样化的生产系统可能起着越来越重要的作用,因为由于诸如流行病和气候变化等全球事件,具有更大的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号