首页> 外文OA文献 >Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust-or Both?
【2h】

Direct Democracy and Political Trust: Enhancing Trust, Initiating Distrust-or Both?

机译:直接民主和政治信托:加强信任,发起不信任 - 或两者?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigates the relationship between direct democracy and political trust. We suggest a solution to the controversy in research centering on positive versus negative effects of direct democracy by analytically differentiating between the availability of direct democratic rights and the actual use of those rights. Theoretically, greater availability of direct democratic rights may enhance political trust by increasing citizens’ perception that political authorities can be controlled as well as by incentivizing political authorities to act trustworthily. In contrast, the actual use of the corresponding direct democratic instruments may initiate distrust as it signals to citizens that political authorities do not act in the public’s interest. We test both hypotheses for the very first time with sub-national data of Switzerland. The empirical results seem to support our theoretical arguments.
机译:本研究调查了直接民主与政治信任之间的关系。我们建议通过在直接民主权利的可用性与实际使用这些权利的情况下,对直接民主的积极与直接民主的负面影响为中心的研究中的争议解决方案。从理论上讲,直接民主权利的更大可用性可以通过增加公民的看法来加强政治信任,即政治当局可以控制政治当局以及激励政治当局来行动,以便托密。相比之下,相应的直接民主文书的实际使用可能会使不信任,因为它向公民发出信号,政治当局不会以公众的利益行事。我们第一次与瑞士的国家数据第一次测试假设。经验结果似乎支持我们的理论论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号