首页> 外文OA文献 >Tests for the Assessment of Sport-Specific Performance in Olympic Combat Sports: A Systematic Review With Practical Recommendations
【2h】

Tests for the Assessment of Sport-Specific Performance in Olympic Combat Sports: A Systematic Review With Practical Recommendations

机译:在奥运会战斗中评估运动特定表现的测试:通过实际建议进行系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The regular monitoring of physical fitness and sport-specific performance is important in elite sports to increase the likelihood of success in competition. This study aimed to systematically review and to critically appraise the methodological quality, validation data, and feasibility of the sport-specific performance assessment in Olympic combat sports like amateur boxing, fencing, judo, karate, taekwondo, and wrestling. A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Google-Scholar, and Science-Direct up to October 2017. Studies in combat sports were included that reported validation data (e.g., reliability, validity, sensitivity) of sport-specific tests. Overall, 39 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The majority of studies (74%) contained sample sizes <30 subjects. Nearly, 1/3 of the reviewed studies lacked a sufficient description (e.g., anthropometrics, age, expertise level) of the included participants. Seventy-two percent of studies did not sufficiently report inclusion/exclusion criteria of their participants. In 62% of the included studies, the description and/or inclusion of a familiarization session (s) was either incomplete or not existent. Sixty-percent of studies did not report any details about the stability of testing conditions. Approximately half of the studies examined reliability measures of the included sport-specific tests (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.43–1.00). Content validity was addressed in all included studies, criterion validity (only the concurrent aspect of it) in approximately half of the studies with correlation coefficients ranging from r = −0.41 to 0.90. Construct validity was reported in 31% of the included studies and predictive validity in only one. Test sensitivity was addressed in 13% of the included studies. The majority of studies (64%) ignored and/or provided incomplete information on test feasibility and methodological limitations of the sport-specific test. In 28% of the included studies, insufficient information or a complete lack of information was provided in the respective field of the test application. Several methodological gaps exist in studies that used sport-specific performance tests in Olympic combat sports. Additional research should adopt more rigorous validation procedures in the application and description of sport-specific performance tests in Olympic combat sports.
机译:身体素质和运动的具体表现进行定期监测是重要的,精英体育,以增加竞争成功的可能性。本研究旨在系统地审查,并严格评价方法的质量,验证数据,并在奥林匹克格斗运动体育特有的绩效考核喜欢的业余拳击,击剑,柔道,空手道,跆拳道,摔跤的可行性。系统的搜索是在电子数据库进行考研,谷歌,学者和科学,直接可达2017十月研究在搏击运动被列入该报告的验证数据的运动专用的测试(例如,可靠性,有效性,灵敏度)。总体而言,39项研究有资格列入本次审查。大多数研究(74%)含有的样本大小<30名受试者。近,经审查研究的1/3缺乏包括参与者的充分描述(例如,人体测量学,年龄,专业知识水平)。研究百分之七十二未能充分报告其参与者包含/排除标准。在纳入研究,说明书和/或列入一个熟悉会话(一个或多个)中的62%是不完整或不存在。研究六十%的人不约的测试条件下的稳定性报告任何细节。大约一半的研究检查了包括运动特定试验(内相关系数(ICC)= 0.43-1.00)的可靠性测量。内容的有效性在所有纳入研究了解决,在大约一半的相关系数的范围从r = -0.41〜0.90的研究标准有效性(仅它的并发方面)。构想效度报告中所包含的研究和预测效度的31%,在唯一的一个。测试灵敏度纳入研究的13%的解决。忽略和/或设置在测试可行性和运动特定测试的方法的局限性,不完整的信息大多数研究(64%)。在纳入研究的28%,不足信息或完全缺乏的信息在测试应用的各个领域进行了设置。有几个方法空白的研究存在,在奥林匹克运动的战斗中使用的特定的运动性能测试。进一步的研究应采用的奥林匹克格斗运动专项运动性能测试的应用程序和说明更严格的验证程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号