首页> 外文OA文献 >Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol
【2h】

Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol

机译:障碍和促进者将心理健康服务纳入初级保健:系统审查议定书

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Mental health is an integral part of health and well-being and yet health systems have not adequately responded to the burden of mental disorders. Integrating mental health services into primary health care (PHC) is the most viable way of closing the treatment gap and ensuring that people get the mental health care they need. PHC was formally adapted by the World Health Organization (WHO), and they have since invested enormous amounts of resources across the globe to ensure that integration of mental health services into PHC works. Methods This review will use the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) framework approach to identify experiences of mental health integration into PHC; the findings will be reported using the “Best fit” framework synthesis. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) will be searched including other sources like the WHO website and OpenGrey database. Assessment of bias and quality will be done at study level using two separate tools to check for the quality of evidence presented. Data synthesis will take on two synergistic approaches (qualitative and quantitative studies). Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. The findings will be useful to a wide array of stakeholders involved in the implementation of the mental health integration into PHC. Discussion The SPIDER framework has been chosen for this review because of its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research and will be used as a guide when selecting articles for inclusion. Data extracted will be synthesized using the “Best fit” framework because it has been used before and proved its suitability in producing new conceptual models for explaining decision-making and possible behaviors. Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016052000
机译:摘要背景心理健康是健康和福祉的一个组成部分,但卫生系统没有充分应对精神障碍的负担。将心理健康服务整合到初级保健(PHC)是关闭治疗差距的最可行方式,确保人们获得所需的心理保健。 PHC正式由世界卫生组织(世卫组织)正式调整,自以此全球投资大量资源以确保精神卫生服务整合到PHC工作中。方法本综述将使用蜘蛛(兴趣,设计,评价,研究类型)框架方法来确定心理健康融入PHC的经验;将使用“最佳拟合”框架综合来报告调查结果。将搜索PubMed,Embase,Psycinfo和Cochrane Central Force(中央中心),包括WHO网站和OpenGrey数据库等其他来源。使用两种独立的工具将在学习水平进行偏见和质量的评估,以检查提出的证据质量。数据综合将采用两种协同方法(定性和定量研究)。综合来自全球各国各国的证据将为将心理健康服务整合到PHC的经验以及如何处理障碍和挑战的经验提供有用的见解。这些调查结果将对各种参与实施心理健康融入博士学位的各种利益相关者有用。讨论蜘蛛框架已被选中,因为它适用于定性和混合方法研究,并将用作选择包涵式的制品时用作指导。提取的数据将使用“最佳拟合”框架合成,因为它以前使用并证明了其适用于制造新的概念模型,以解释决策和可能的行为。综合来自全球各国各国的证据将为将心理健康服务整合到PHC的经验以及如何处理障碍和挑战的经验提供有用的见解。系统审查登记Prospero CRD42016052000

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号