首页> 外文OA文献 >WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Quality of Life, Wellbeing and Mental Health
【2h】

WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Quality of Life, Wellbeing and Mental Health

机译:欧洲地区的环境噪声指南:对环境噪音和生活质量,福祉和心理健康的系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This systematic review assesses the quality of the evidence across studies on the effect of environmental noise (road traffic noise, aircraft noise, railway noise, wind-turbine noise) on quality of life, wellbeing and mental health. Quantitative studies of noise effects on children and adults published from January 2005 up to October 2015 were reviewed. A total of 29 papers were identified. 90% of the papers were of cross-sectional design, with fewer studies of longitudinal or intervention design. Outcomes included depression and anxiety, medication use and childhood emotional problems. The quality of the evidence across the studies for each individual noise source was assessed using an adaptation of the GRADE methodology. Overall, given the predominance of cross-sectional studies, most evidence was rated as very low quality, with evidence of effects only being observed for some noise sources and outcomes. These ratings reflect inconsistent findings across studies, the small number of studies and a lack of methodological robustness within some domains. Overall, there are few studies of clinically significant mental health outcomes; few studies of railway noise exposure; and studies of large samples are needed. The lack of evidence for noise effects across studies for many of the quality of life, wellbeing and mental health domains examined does not necessarily mean that there are no effects: rather, that they have not yet been studied robustly for different noise sources.
机译:这种系统审查评估了对环境噪声(道路交通噪声,飞机噪声,铁路噪声,风力涡轮噪声,风力涡轮噪声)对生命质量,福祉和心理健康影响的证据的质量。综述了2005年1月至2015年10月发布的儿童和成人噪声影响的定量研究。共鉴定了29篇论文。 90%的论文是横截面设计,对纵向或干预设计的研究较少。结果包括抑郁和焦虑,药物使用和童年情绪问题。使用等级方法的适应评估对每个单独噪声源进行研究的证据的质量。总体而言,鉴于横截面研究的主要职位,大多数证据被评为非常低的质量,只有对某些噪声来源和结果观察到效果的证据。这些评级反映了跨研究的不一致结果,少数研究以及一些域内的方法鲁棒性。总体而言,临床上显着的心理健康结果几乎没有研究;少数关于铁路噪音暴露的研究;需要对大型样品进行研究。缺乏针对许多生命质量的研究噪音影响的证据并不一定意味着没有影响:相反,他们尚未对不同的噪声来源鲁莽地研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号