首页> 外文OA文献 >Non-invasive Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and ZOOM Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Micronodules
【2h】

Non-invasive Amide Proton Transfer Imaging and ZOOM Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Micronodules

机译:非侵入性酰胺质子转移成像和变焦扩散加权成像在差异良性和恶性甲状腺微芯片中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Pre-operative non-invasive differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules is difficult for doctors. This study aims to determine whether amide proton transfer (APT) imaging and zonally oblique multi-slice (ZOOM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can provide increased accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and included 60 thyroid nodules in 50 patients. All of the nodules were classified as malignant (n = 21) or benign (n = 39) based on pathology. It was meaningful to analyze the APT and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the two groups by independent t-test to identify the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The relationship between APT and ZOOM DWI was explored through Pearson correlation analysis. The diagnostic efficacy of APT and ZOOM DWI in determining if thyroid nodules were benign or malignant was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: The mean APTw value of the benign nodules was 2.99 ± 0.79, while that of the malignant nodules was 2.14 ± 0.73. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the APTw values of the two groups (P < 0.05). The mean ADC value of the benign nodules was 1.84 ± 0.41, and was significantly different from that of the malignant nodules, which was 1.21 ± 0.19 (P < 0.05). Scatter point and Pearson test showed a moderate positive correlation between the APT and ADC values (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) value of ZOOM DWI (AUC = 0.937) was greater than that of APT (AUC = 0.783) (P = 0.028).Conclusion: APT and ZOOM DWI imaging improved the accuracy of distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. ZOOM DWI is superior to APTw imaging (Z = 2.198, P < 0.05).
机译:背景:良性和恶性甲状腺结节的手术前的非侵入性分化是困难的医生。本研究旨在确定是否酰胺质子转移(APT)成像和纬向斜多切片(ZOOM)扩散加权成像(DWI)可以在鉴别良性和恶性甲状腺nodules.Methods提供增加的准确度:这回顾性研究是经机构审查委员会,其中包括50名患者60个甲状腺结节。所有的结节被归类为基于病理学恶性的(N = 21)或良性的(N = 39)。这是有意义的由独立的t检验来分析两组的APT和表观扩散系数(ADC)值来识别所述良性和恶性甲状腺结节。 APT和ZOOM DWI之间的关系是通过Pearson相关分析探索。 APT和ZOOM DWI的用于确定是否甲状腺结节良性或恶性的,使用接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线分析。结果相比,诊断功效:良性结节的平均APTw值为2.99±0.79,而恶性结节为2.14±0.73。此外,有两组的APTw值显著差异(P <0.05)。良性结节的平均ADC值为1.84±0.41,并且是从该恶性结节,这为1.21±0.19(P <0.05)的显著不同。散射点和Pearson检验呈阳性适中的APT和ADC值之间(P <0.05)相关。 ROC曲线表明,ZOOM DWI(AUC = 0.937)的曲线下的面积(AUC)值比的APT(AUC = 0.783)的情况下(P = 0.028)。结论:APT和ZOOM DWI摄像改善的准确性良性和恶性甲状腺结节之间的区分。 ZOOM DWI优于APTw成像(Z = 2.198,P <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号