首页> 外文OA文献 >A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
【2h】

A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018

机译:从1944年至2018年评估杀虫剂屏障处理的研究综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Purpose: Barrier insecticide treatments have a long history in mosquito control programs but have been used more frequently in the United States in recent years for control of invasive “backyard” species (eg, Aedes albopictus ) and increases in incidence of vector-borne diseases (eg, Zika). Methods: We reviewed the published literature for studies investigating barrier treatments for mosquito control during the last 74 years (1944-2018). We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to retrieve worldwide literature on barrier treatments. Results: Forty-four studies that evaluated 20 active ingredients (AIs) and 21 formulated products against multiple mosquito species are included. Insecticides investigated for efficacy included organochlorines (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT], β-hexachlorocyclohexane [BHC]), organophosphates (malathion), and pyrethroids (bifenthrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin) as AIs. Study design varied with multiple methods used to evaluate effectiveness of barrier treatments. Barrier treatments were effective at lowering mosquito populations although there was variation between studies and for different mosquito species. Factors other than AI, such as exposure to rainfall and application equipment used, also influenced control efficacy. Conclusions: Many of the basic questions on the effectiveness of barrier insecticide applications have been answered, but several important details still must be investigated to improve precision and impact on vector-borne pathogen transmission. Recommendations are made to assist future evaluations of barrier treatments for mosquito control and to limit the potential development of insecticide resistance.
机译:背景和宗旨:屏障杀虫剂治疗在蚊子控制计划中具有悠久的历史,但近年来在美国更频繁地使用了侵入性“后院”种(例如,AEDES Albopictus)并增加了向量传播的发病率疾病(例如,Zika)。方法:在过去74岁期间,我们审查了研究调查蚊虫控制的屏障治疗的研究文献(1944-2018)。我们搜索了PubMed,Science Web等数据库,以及谷歌学员在障碍处理中检索全球文献。结果:评估20种活性成分(AIS)和21种针对多种蚊虫物种的21种配制产品的四十四项研究。研究了疗效的杀虫剂包括有机氯(二氯甲酸二氯甲烷乙烷[DDT],β-六氯环己烷[BHC]),有机磷酸盐(malathion)和拟除虫菊酯(Bifenthrin,Delamethrin,Permethrin,Lambda-Cyhalothrin)作为AIS。研究设计随着用于评估阻隔处理有效性的多种方法而变化。障碍处理在降低蚊子群体中有效,尽管研究与不同的蚊子物种之间存在变化。除了AI之外的因素,例如接触降雨和所用应用设备,也影响了控制效率。结论:已经回答了关于阻隔杀虫剂应用的有效性的许多基本问题,但仍然必须调查几个重要细节,以提高对载体传播病原体传播的精度和影响。建议采取建议,帮助未来对蚊虫控制的阻隔处理评估,并限制潜在杀虫剂抗性的潜在发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号