首页> 外文OA文献 >Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center
【2h】

Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center

机译:Altmetrics可以反映社会影响因素吗?:在可持续发展科学研究中心的背景下探索Altmetrics的潜力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Societal impact considerations play an increasingly important role in research evaluation. In particular, in the context of publicly funded research, proposal templates commonly include sections to outline strategies for achieving broader impact. Both the assessment of the strategies and the later evaluation of their success are associated with challenges in their own right. Ever since their introduction, altmetrics have been discussed as a remedy for assessing the societal impact of research output. On the basis of data from a research center in Switzerland, this study explores their potential for this purpose. The study is based on the papers (and the corresponding metrics) published by about 200 either accepted or rejected applicants for funding by the Competence Center Environment and Sustainability (CCES). The results of the study seem to indicate that altmetrics are not suitable for reflecting the societal impact of research that was considered: The metrics do not correlate with the ex ante considerations of an expert panel.
机译:社会影响考虑在研究评估中起着越来越重要的作用。特别是,在公共资助的研究的背景下,提案模板通常包括概述更广泛影响的概述策略。对战略的评估以及后来对其成功的评估与自己的权利有关。自从他们的介绍以来,已经讨论了Altmetrics作为评估研究产出的社会影响的补救措施。在瑞士研究中心的数据的基础上,本研究探讨了他们为此目的的潜力。该研究基于由竞争力中心环境和可持续发展(CCE)的资金提供约200名接受或拒绝申请人的论文(以及相应的指标)。该研究的结果似乎表明,AltMetrics不适合反映所考虑的研究的社会影响:指标与专家小组的前蚂蚁考虑不相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号