首页> 外文OA文献 >Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: Converging Human Rights Standards, Mutual Trust and a New Ground for Postponing a European Arrest Warrant
【2h】

Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: Converging Human Rights Standards, Mutual Trust and a New Ground for Postponing a European Arrest Warrant

机译:加入案例Aranyosi和Căldăraru:融合人权标准,相互信任和推迟欧洲逮捕令的新理由

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This case-note provides a critical overview of Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, Aranyosi and Căldăraru. The CJEU tries to reconcile the principles of mutual trust and recognition with the protection of the fundamental rights of the requested person. Instead of introducing a new ground of refusal for a European Arrest Warrant based on the breach of fundamental rights, the CJEU opted for a ground of postponement. Furthermore, it brings its two-tier ‘systemic deficiencies’ test closer to the standards used by the ECtHR and encourages dialogue between the issuing and executing judicial authorities. Nevertheless, the scope of application of the new ground of postponement is not entirely clear and it is not yet sure what happens after the executing judicial authority postpones its decision due to evidence of a real risk that the requested person will be subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment in the issuing Member State.
机译:本案例说明提供了加入案例C-404/15和C-659/15 PPU,Aranyosi和C1LDăraru的关键概述。 CJEU试图通过保护所要求人员的基本权利来协调互信和认可的原则。基于违反基本权利,CJEU选择延期地理由,而不是介绍欧洲逮捕令的拒绝申请新的拒绝新的拒绝新的基础。此外,它将其双层的“系统性缺陷”测试更接近ECTHR使用的标准,并鼓励发行和执行司法当局之间的对话。尽管如此,延期新建的应用范围并不完全清楚,并尚不确定执行司法当局后会导起的决定,因为所要求的人会受到不人道和有辱人格的真正风险的证据签发成员国的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号