首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Road Pavement Maintenance Prioritization: Methodological Exposition and Case Study
【2h】

Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Road Pavement Maintenance Prioritization: Methodological Exposition and Case Study

机译:道路路面维修优先级模糊AHP与模糊Topsis的比较:方法论博览会和案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For road pavement maintenance and repairs prioritization, a multiattribute approach that compares fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Ideal Situation (TOPSIS) is evaluated. The pavement distress data was collected through empirical condition surveys and rating by pavement experts. In comparison to the crisp AHP, the fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS pairwise comparison techniques are considered to be more suitable for the subjective analysis of the pavement conditions for automated maintenance prioritization. From the case study results, four pavement maintenance objectives were determined as road safety, pavement surface preservation, road operational status and standards, and road aesthetics, with corresponding depreciating significance weights of W=0.37,0.31,0.22,0.10T. The top three maintenance functions were identified as Thin Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlays, resurfacing and slurry seals, which were a result of pavement cracking, potholes, raveling, and patching, while the bottom three were cape seal, micro surfacing, and fog seal. The two methods gave nearly the same prioritization ranking. In general, the fuzzy AHP approach tended to overestimate the maintenance prioritization ranking as compared to the fuzzy TOPSIS.
机译:对于道路路面维护和维修优先级,评估了一种与理想情况(TOPSIS)进行了比较了模糊分析层次处理(AHP)和针对顺序偏好的模糊技术的多特性方法。路面遇险数据是通过经验状况调查和路面专家评级收集的。与清晰的AHP相比,模糊AHP和模糊TOPSIS成对比较技术被认为更适合于对自动维护优先级排序的路面条件的主观分析。从案例研究结果来看,四个路面维护目标被确定为道路安全,路面保护,道路运营状况和标准以及道路美学,相应的折旧意义重量为0.37,0.31,0.22,0.10t。前三个维护功能被识别为薄的热混合沥青(HMA)覆盖,重叠和浆料密封件,其是路面开裂,坑洼,螺旋和修补的结果,而底部三是海角密封,微表面和雾海豹。这两种方法具有几乎相同的优先级排名。通常,与模糊Tootsis相比,模糊AHP方法倾向于高估维护优先级排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号