首页> 外文OA文献 >Recall of a live and personally experienced eyewitness event by adults with autism spectrum disorder
【2h】

Recall of a live and personally experienced eyewitness event by adults with autism spectrum disorder

机译:通过Autisph谱系障碍的成年人回忆一场生活和个人经历的目击者事件

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to (a) extend previous eyewitness research in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using a live and personally experienced event; (b) examine whether witnesses with ASD demonstrate a facilitative effect in memory for self- over other-performed actions; (c) explore source monitoring abilities by witnesses with ASD in discriminating who performed which actions within the event. Eighteen high-functioning adults with ASD and 18 age- and IQ-matched typical counterparts participated in a live first aid scenario in which they and the experimenter each performed a number of actions. Participants were subsequently interviewed for their memory of the event using a standard interview procedure with free recall followed by questioning. The ASD group recalled just as many correct details as the comparison group from the event overall, however they made more errors. This was the case across both free recall and questioning phases. Both groups showed a self-enactment effect across both interview phases, recalling more actions that they had performed themselves than actions that the experimenter had performed. However, the ASD group were more likely than their typical comparisons to confuse the source of self-performed actions in free recall, but not in questioning, which may indicate executive functioning difficulties with unsupported test procedures. Findings are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications.
机译:本研究的目的是(a)使用现场和亲身经历的事件来扩展先前对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的目击者研究; (b)检查患有自闭症的证人是否在记忆中表现出对自我执行的其他行为的促进作用; (c)由ASD的证人探索源监控能力,以区分谁在事件中执行了哪些操作。 18名具有ASD的高功能成年人和18位年龄和智商相匹配的典型同伴参加了现场急救方案,在该方案中,他们和实验人员各自执行了许多操作。随后,参与者使用标准的采访程序对他们对事件的记忆进行采访,并免费召回,然后进行质询。 ASD小组从事件总体上回顾了与比较小组一样多的正确细节,但是他们犯了更多错误。免费召回和提问阶段都是这种情况。两组在访谈的两个阶段均表现出自我实施的效果,回想起他们自己执行的动作要多于实验者所执行的动作。但是,ASD小组比其典型的比较更有可能在自由召回中而不是在质疑中混淆自我执行行为的来源,这可能表明执行程序在没有支持的测试程序的情况下会遇到困难。研究结果从理论和实践意义上进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号