首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing the State-of-the-Art Efficient Stated Choice Designs Based on Empirical Analysis
【2h】

Comparing the State-of-the-Art Efficient Stated Choice Designs Based on Empirical Analysis

机译:基于实证分析,比较了最先进的高效规定的选择设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The stated choice (SC) experiment has been generally regarded as an effective method for behavior analysis. Among all the SC experimental design methods, the orthogonal design has been most widely used since it is easy to understand and construct. However, in recent years, a stream of research has put emphasis on the so-called efficient experimental designs rather than keeping the orthogonality of the experiment, as the former is capable of producing more efficient data in the sense that more reliable parameter estimates can be achieved with an equal or lower sample size. This paper provides two state-of-the-art methods called optimal orthogonal choice (OOC) and D-efficient design. More statistically efficient data is expected to be obtained by either maximizing attribute level differences, or minimizing the D-error, a statistic corresponding to the asymptotic variance-covariance (AVC) matrix of the discrete choice model, when using these two methods, respectively. Since comparison and validation in the field of these methods are rarely seen, an empirical study is presented. D-error is chosen as the measure of efficiency. The result shows that both OOC and D-efficient design are more efficient. At last, strength and weakness of orthogonal, OOC, and D-efficient design are summarized.
机译:所述选择(SC)实验一般被认为是一种有效的行为分析方法。在所有SC实验设计方法中,正交设计最广泛使用,因为它易于理解和构建。然而,近年来,一流的研究已经强调所谓的高效实验设计,而不是保持实验的正交性,因为前者能够在更可靠的参数估计的意义上产生更有效的数据以等于或更低的样品尺寸实现。本文提供了两种称为最佳正交选择(OOC)和D高效设计的最先进的方法。当使用这两种方法时,预期通过最大化属性级别差异,或最小化D误差,分别使用这两种方法,预期通过最大化属性级别差异,或者最小化与离散选择模型的渐近选择模型的渐近方差协方差(AVC)矩阵相对应的统计来获得更高的统计有效数据。由于很少看到这些方法领域的比较和验证,因此提出了一个实证研究。选择D误差作为效率的度量。结果表明,OOC和D高效设计都更有效。最后,总结了正交,OOC和D-高效设计的力量和弱点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号