首页> 外文OA文献 >To Cooperate or Not? An Analysis of Complementary Product Pricing in Green Supply Chain
【2h】

To Cooperate or Not? An Analysis of Complementary Product Pricing in Green Supply Chain

机译:合作还是合作?绿色供应链互补产品定价分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper investigates the green supply chain pricing problem when two manufacturers sell complementary products to one retailer. Considering the manufacturers’ cooperation or noncooperation strategies, we first give the centralized pricing model as a benchmark. According to market power among the supply chain, we analyze two types of supply chains: supplier-led type where the green driving factor comes from the suppliers and retailer-led type where the core member retailer leads the green supply chain. We then give two decentralized pricing models through considering strategic cooperation between two manufacturers and different structures. Corresponding closed-form expressions for equilibrium pricing strategies are established. Finally, many valuable managerial results are acquired through comparing the profits and equilibrium decisions of these models. Our paper shows that consumers are indifferent as to who is the leader of the two echelons when the manufacturers adopt non-cooperative action; the two complementary products get the same optimal wholesale/retail prices, maximum retail margins, and maximum demands regardless of the manufacturers’ cooperation or noncooperation strategies.
机译:本文调查了两家制造商向一家零售商销售互补产品时的绿色供应链定价问题。考虑到制造商的合作或非协议策略,我们首先将集中定价模型作为基准。根据供应链中的市场权力,我们分析了两种类型的供应链:供应商-LED类型,绿色驱动因子来自供应商和零售商领导类型,核心成员零售商领导绿色供应链。然后,我们通过考虑两个制造商和不同结构之间的战略合作,给出两个分散的定价模型。建立了用于平衡定价策略的相应闭合表达。最后,通过比较这些模型的利润和均衡决策来获得许多有价值的管理结果。我们的论文表明,当制造商采用非合作行动时,消费者是谁是谁是两个梯度的领导者;无论制造商的合作或非协作策略如何,这两个补充产品都获得了相同的最佳批发/零售价格,最大零售利润率和最大要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号