首页> 外文OA文献 >System-Wide Accelerated Implementation of Telemedicine in Response to COVID-19: Mixed Methods Evaluation
【2h】

System-Wide Accelerated Implementation of Telemedicine in Response to COVID-19: Mixed Methods Evaluation

机译:响应Covid-19的系统范围内加速实现远程医疗的实施:混合方法评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAs the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical practice, telemedicine emerged as an alternative to outpatient visits. However, it is not known how patients and physicians responded to an accelerated implementation of this model of medical care. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to report the system-wide accelerated implementation of telemedicine, compare patient satisfaction between telemedicine and in-person visits, and report provider perceptions. MethodsThis study was conducted at the UC Christus Health Network, a large private academic health network in Santiago, Chile. The satisfaction of patients receiving telemedicine care in March and April 2020 was compared to those receiving in-person care during the same period (concurrent control group) as well as in March and April 2019 (retrospective control group). Patient satisfaction with in-person care was measured using the Net Promoter Score (NPS) survey. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine was assessed with an online survey assessing similar domains. Providers rated their satisfaction and responded to open-ended questions assessing challenges, strategies used to address challenges, the diagnostic process, treatment, and the patient-provider relationship. ResultsA total of 3962 patients receiving telemedicine, 1187 patients from the concurrent control group, and 1848 patients from the retrospective control group completed the surveys. Satisfaction was very high with both telemedicine and in-person services. Overall, 263 physicians from over 41 specialties responded to the survey. During telemedicine visits, most providers felt their clinical skills were challenged (61.8%). Female providers felt more challenged than male providers (70.7% versus 50.9%, P=.002). Surgeons, obstetricians, and gynecologists felt their clinical skills were challenged the least, compared to providers from nonsurgical specialties (P<.001). Challenges related to the delivery modality, diagnostic process, and patient-provider relationship differed by provider specialty (P=.046, P<.001, and P=.02, respectively). ConclusionsTelemedicine implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic produced high patient and provider satisfaction. Specialty groups perceived the impact of this new mode of clinical practice differently.
机译:Backgroundas Covid-19大流行中断了医疗实践,远程医疗被出现为替代门诊访问。但是,尚不清楚患者和医生如何应对这种医疗模式的加速实施。本研究的目标是报告信息化水平的系统范围内的实施,比较远程医疗和人员之间的患者满意度,以及报告提供者的看法。方法学习在智利圣地亚哥的大型私人学术健康网络上进行了研究。将在3月20日和4月2020年3月接受远程医疗护理的患者的满意度与在同一时期(并发对照组)以及2019年3月和4月(回顾性对照组)中接受亲人护理的患者。使用净启动子评分(NPS)调查测量与亲自护理的患者满意度。通过评估类似领域的在线调查评估了与远程医疗的患者满意度。提供商评估了他们的满​​意度,并回应了评估挑战的开放式问题,用于解决挑战,诊断过程,治疗和患者 - 提供者关系的挑战。结果总共3962例接受远程医疗,1187名患者患者,从并发对照组,以及1848名患者从回顾性对照组完成调查。与远程医疗和亲人的服务,满意度非常高。总体而言,来自41多家专业的263名医生回应了调查。在远程医疗访问期间,大多数提供商认为他们的临床技能受到挑战(61.8%)。女性供应商比男性提供者感到更具挑战(70.7%,而50.9%,p = .002)。与非本质专业的提供者相比,外科医生,产科医生和妇科医生认为他们的临床技能最少地挑战(P <.001)。挑战与提供的方式,诊断过程和患者提供者关系有关提供商专业不同(P = .046,P <.001,P = .02)。结论用于回应Covid-19大流行的高病患者和提供者满意度实施的司令。特色团体认为这种新的临床实践的影响不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号